The UK i.AI built Redbox, an open-source RAG chatbot enabling civil servants to interrogate policy documents via LLM. Deployed to 6,000+ staff across 3 departments, it saved a median 2 h/week per user. Sunset in 2025 when enterprise AI tools were adopted.
6,000+ civil servants
Civil servants served over full lifecycle
2000 users
Active civil-service users (February 2025)
~150 new users/week
Weekly growth in active users (February 2025)
150000 chats
Chats supported over full lifecycle
1.3 million messages
Messages processed over full lifecycle
7000 documents
Documents processed (February 2025)
80 %
Users reporting improved work quality (user survey, n=282)
89 %
Users reporting time saved (user survey, n=282)
2 hours/week
Median estimated time saved per user (user survey, n=282)
56
Net Promoter Score (user survey, n=282)
Details
Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
UK Cabinet Office / Incubator for Artificial Intelligence (i.AI)
Period
2023–2025
Keywords
civil service, document analysis, generative AI, public administration
Context
Redbox is a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) chatbot built by the UK Government's Incubator for Artificial Intelligence (i.AI), a unit within the Cabinet Office. It let civil servants upload letters, briefings, minutes, speech transcripts and policy documents and query them in natural language, receiving summarised answers with direct citations to source documents. The tool was piloted from late 2023 and takes its name from the red briefcases used to carry ministerial papers.
Objectives
Redbox aimed to help civil servants interrogate large volumes of policy documents more efficiently through a generative AI assistant, while keeping outputs verifiable through direct citation links to source material. This citation feature was explicitly designed to make hallucinations visible and checkable by users, addressing a key trust concern with generative AI in government use.
Activities
Redbox was deployed to the Cabinet Office, 10 Downing Street and the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), with algorithmic transparency records subsequently published on GOV.UK for the DSIT and Department for Business and Trade (DBT) deployments. The full codebase was released as open source on GitHub. By February 2025 the platform had 2,000 active civil-service users, growing by approximately 150 per week, and in that month alone it processed 7,000 documents including grant evaluations, invoices and policy papers.
Results
Over its full lifecycle Redbox served more than 6,000 civil servants, supporting 150,000 chats and processing 1.3 million messages. A user survey (n=282) found that 80% felt Redbox improved the quality of their work and 89% said it saved them time, with a median estimated saving of 2 hours per week; the resulting Net Promoter Score of 56 was above the 'excellent' threshold of 50.
Conclusions
In 2025, i.AI announced Redbox's discontinuation after the Cabinet Office consolidated onto commercial enterprise AI services (Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini) offered across government. i.AI published a public retrospective identifying five lessons from building and sunsetting the tool, including the need to align sovereign AI tooling with departmental strategies before scaling — a rare candid post-mortem of a government AI project.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No published budget figures were found; the tool was built and operated in-house by a dedicated government AI unit (i.AI) and released as open-source software across three departments over roughly two years — a conservative medium cost-band estimate.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Piloted from late 2023, scaled through 2024 and early 2025 to 6,000+ users, then discontinued in 2025 — a lifecycle of roughly two years.
Staffing & skills
Built and operated by the UK Government's Incubator for Artificial Intelligence (i.AI), a dedicated unit within the Cabinet Office, Deployed and supported across the Cabinet Office, 10 Downing Street, and the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT)
Conditions for success
Publishing algorithmic transparency records and citation-linked answers to build user trust and public accountability
Open-sourcing the codebase on GitHub to allow scrutiny and potential reuse
Common failure modes
Failure to align sovereign, in-house AI tooling with departmental strategy before scaling, as identified in i.AI's own retrospective
Availability of commercial enterprise AI services (Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini) reduced the case for continued investment in a bespoke tool, leading to discontinuation in 2025
Where it fits
Governance type
national government / central government unit
Scale
3 departments, 6,000+ civil servants
Income level
high-income (UK)
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.