evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Ulysses Suite — Brazil's Chamber of Deputies AI Platform for Legislative Work

Brazil · Brasília · See the Brazil profile · See the Brasília profile

Top 49% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2018 Brazil's Chamber of Deputies has run Ulysses, an eight-module AI suite matching similar bills (20,000+ requests/yr), transcribing speeches, analysing comments and authenticating votes biometrically; a 2025-26 relaunch added AI governance rules.

Ulysses Suite — Brazil's Chamber of Deputies AI Platform for Legislative Work

Details

Promoter
Câmara dos Deputados (Brazilian Chamber of Deputies)
Period
2018–present
Keywords
legislative technology, public administration, natural language processing

Description

Brazil's Chamber of Deputies (Câmara dos Deputados) has operated Ulysses, an in-house suite of AI and natural-language-processing tools for legislative work, since 2018. The suite grew out of the Chamber's Digital Strategy (Act 268/2021) and now comprises eight modules, labelled U1 through U8, covering distinct parts of the legislative workflow.

U1 aggregates thematic content for the Chamber's legislative-studies portal. U2 semi-automatically routes citizen and staff requests to the relevant legislative-counsel groups. U3, the most heavily used module, runs semantic analysis to flag bills similar to a new proposal and processes more than 20,000 such requests every year. U4 clusters amendments using NLP, U5 transcribes plenary and committee speech (built on Microsoft Azure speech-to-text, with a migration to OpenAI Whisper planned), and U6 analyses public e-poll comments on bills. U7 and U8 apply biometric facial recognition, respectively to authenticate parliamentary votes through the Infoleg app and to tag legislators automatically in official photographs.

In December 2025 the Chamber announced a new phase of the programme: an internal 'Ulysses Chat' assistant for staff, formal permission for employees to use external tools such as Claude, Gemini and GPT, and a new set of AI governance and security policies to accompany the expansion. No independent evaluation of the modules' accuracy, error rates or legislative impact has been published, and the biometric voting and facial-recognition modules operate without a named external oversight body.

Read the full analysis: https://www.mobiletime.com.br/noticias/15/12/2025/ulysses-camara-nova-fase/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful