The University of Latvia's Senate approved a binding AI-use regulation, effective 16 March 2026, built on integrity, transparency, responsibility and data-security principles and requiring students to disclose AI use — one of the first such Senate rules at any Latvian university.
higher education, academic integrity, AI governance, assessment policy
Context
In 2024 the University of Latvia (Latvijas Universitate, LU), the country's largest and oldest university, published its first Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Study Process, endorsed by Rector Prof. Gundars Berzins and built on principles of safe, transparent, traceable and non-discriminatory AI use, including mandatory disclosure of AI use in coursework.
Activities
Following 2025-26 amendments to Latvia's national Law on Higher Education Institutions, the University's Senate approved a binding regulation on AI use in the study process, effective 16 March 2026 - reported as one of the first Senate-level AI regulations at any Latvian university. It is built around four principles (integrity, transparency, responsibility, data security), again makes AI-use disclosure mandatory, and frames AI as a permissible 'assistant' rather than a substitute for a student's own work. An updated companion guideline with worked examples accompanies it, alongside planned staff professional development on AI-informed teaching methods.
Conclusions
This is a governance and assessment-integrity measure, not an evaluated pedagogical intervention: no compliance-audit results, violation statistics or learning-outcome data have been published, and its real-world effectiveness once in force from March 2026 remains untested. Separately, Turiba University in Latvia has led a related cross-border AI-and-academic-integrity project with partners in Lithuania, Portugal, Germany, Poland, Croatia and Turkey, developing shared guidelines and free training materials for lecturers.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
University of Latvia Senate and Rector's office, Staff involved in planned professional development on AI-informed teaching methods
Conditions for success
Alignment with amended national Law on Higher Education Institutions (2025-26)
Two-stage development from voluntary guidance (2024) to binding Senate rule (2026), allowing time to build institutional buy-in
Worked examples of acceptable/unacceptable use accompanying the regulation
Common failure modes
No compliance-audit results, violation statistics or learning-outcome data published yet; real-world effectiveness untested as of the regulation's effective date
Where it fits
Governance type
university institutional governance
Scale
single institution (Latvia's largest university)
Income level
high income
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Facing evidence that AI-text detectors misclassify non-native English writing, South Africa's UCT, Stellenbosch, UFS and Wits disabled Turnitin's AI detector …
The Caribbean Examinations Council published binding, region-wide standards governing AI use in CSEC, CAPE and CCSLC school-based assessments across its …