Universidad de Nariño's admissions office built VyCla, a WhatsApp chatbot for undergraduate enrollment queries; in a controlled evaluation with 122 users and 462 resolved inquiries, average response time fell 99.81%, from 666 minutes to 1.25 minutes.
666.04 minutes
Average response time (manual baseline)
1.25 minutes
Average response time (with VyCla)
99.81 %
Reduction in average response time
99 %
Model accuracy
4.23 out of 5
Mean user-satisfaction score
462 inquiries
Resolved inquiries in evaluation phase
Details
Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Universidad de Nariño — Oficina de Control, Registro Académico y Admisiones (OCARA)
Period
2025-2026
Keywords
higher education, university admissions, natural language processing, chatbot
Context
At Universidad de Nariño in Colombia, the Office of Control, Academic Records and Admissions (OCARA) handled undergraduate enrollment and admissions questions manually, with an average response time the study later measured at 666.04 minutes — over eleven hours — per query, straining a small staff during peak enrollment periods.
Objectives
The university's team set out to cut response times and improve the student/applicant experience for enrollment and admissions queries using a natural-language-processing WhatsApp chatbot.
Activities
The team built VyCla, a natural-language-processing chatbot integrated with WhatsApp, using an agile Scrum process across five sprints and a stack of Node.js, Python (Flask, NLTK) and PostgreSQL. The underlying intent-classification model was trained on 13,996 phrases spanning 21 intents covering common enrollment and admissions questions. An initial diagnostic phase surveyed 4 university staff, 105 enrolled students and 45 prospective applicants to map real information needs.
Results
In the evaluation phase, 122 users interacted with VyCla, generating 462 resolved inquiries; the study reported 99% model accuracy, a mean user-satisfaction score of 4.23 out of 5, a mean recommendation score of 4.07 out of 5, and an average response time of 1.25 minutes, a 99.81% reduction from the manual baseline. The work was published in the peer-reviewed Revista Colombiana de Tecnologías de Avanzada (Vol. 1, No. 47, 2026).
Conclusions
The comparison baseline (666 minutes) reflects OCARA's own prior manual process rather than an external benchmark, and the evaluation sample (122 users) is a fraction of the university's full applicant pool, so the reported figures describe a successful pilot rather than a fully scaled, independently audited deployment; the authors frame further extension to other administrative processes as future work, not something already proven.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Built in-house with an open-source stack (Node.js, Python/Flask/NLTK, PostgreSQL); no separate budget figure published.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Developed across five agile sprints; evaluation and publication reported in 2025-2026 (Revista Colombiana de Tecnologías de Avanzada, Vol.1 No.47).
Staffing & skills
Universidad de Nariño's Office of Control, Academic Records and Admissions (OCARA) development team
Conditions for success
Agile Scrum process across five sprints
Diagnostic phase surveying staff, enrolled students and prospective applicants to map real information needs before build
Intent-classification model trained on a large phrase set (13,996 phrases, 21 intents)
Deployment over WhatsApp, a widely-used low-bandwidth channel in Colombia
Common failure modes
Baseline comparison is against the office's own prior manual process, not an external benchmark
Evaluation sample (122 users) is a fraction of the university's full applicant pool
No equity or regional breakdown of users reported
Where it fits
Governance type
public university administrative office
Scale
single university admissions office
Income level
upper-middle-income
Commonly funded by
Own resources / municipal budget
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.