evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Washington, D.C.'s Stormwater Retention Credit (SRC) Trading Program

United States of America · Washington, D.C. · See the United States of America profile · See the Washington, D.C. profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 69% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Washington, D.C.'s stormwater credit market lets developers buy tradeable credits from landowners who install green infrastructure, meeting part of their runoff-retention rules while avoiding costly grey infrastructure.

1.7 million+ credits (gallons of retention/year)
Credits sold since launch (2013-2024)
1.7 million+ USD
Total value of credits sold (2013-2024)
40 million+ gallons/year
Stormwater runoff captured and treated annually (as of 2024)
26 sellers
Registered credit sellers (2024)
0.42 to 2.03 USD/credit
DOEE purchase price range (2024)
Washington, D.C.'s Stormwater Retention Credit (SRC) Trading Program

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
DC Department of Energy & Environment (DOEE)
Period
2013-present
Keywords
stormwater management, green infrastructure, environmental markets, urban water

Context

Washington, D.C.'s Department of Energy & Environment (DOEE) launched the Stormwater Retention Credit (SRC) Trading Program in 2013, the first market of its kind in the United States.

Objectives

Property owners who voluntarily install green infrastructure (rain gardens, green roofs, permeable pavement) that retains stormwater beyond regulatory requirements can have DOEE certify and issue tradeable SRCs, each equal to one gallon of retention capacity for one year, which developers can buy to meet on-site retention requirements they cannot otherwise fully meet.

Activities

Developers purchase SRCs on the open market or through DOEE's Stormwater Retention Credit Price Lock Program, avoiding the cost of building additional grey stormwater infrastructure. The first voluntary credit-generating project was a set of rain gardens at Mount Olivet Cemetery, developed by the Catholic Archdiocese of Washington with The Nature Conservancy.

Results

By the programme's ten-year mark in 2024, more than 1.7 million credits had been sold -- through private trades and DOEE's Purchase Agreement Program -- worth over $1.7 million and representing more than 40 million gallons of stormwater runoff captured and treated annually. As of 2024 the credit registry listed 26 individual sellers, with DOEE purchase prices ranging from $0.42 to $2.03 per credit.

Conclusions

The programme depends on continued regulatory demand for credits and on DOEE's certification/verification capacity; credit prices have fluctuated over the decade as supply and demand shifted, transferring market risk onto both buyers and green-infrastructure sellers.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No total public administrative budget is stated; the market's own trading value (over $1.7 million across 10 years) is private-sector transaction value, not government programme cost. Conservatively estimated as 'medium' (agency certification/registry administration), noted as inferred, not stated.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Running continuously since 2013, past its ten-year anniversary in 2024.
Staffing & skills
DC Department of Energy & Environment (DOEE) -- certification, verification and registry administration

Conditions for success

  • Regulatory retention requirements on new development create durable demand for credits
  • DOEE Price Lock Program reduces market-price risk for buyers
  • Clear 1-credit-per-gallon-per-year unit definition simplifies trading

Common failure modes

  • Programme depends on continued regulatory demand persisting
  • Credit prices have fluctuated with supply/demand shifts, transferring market risk to both sides
  • No independent evaluation of the market against a non-market counterfactual

Where it fits

Governance type
municipal/city government regulatory agency
Scale
city-wide market mechanism
Income level
high-income

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful