evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

WebThai2Access — Co-Tested Web Accessibility Checker for Thai-Language Sites

Thailand · Surat Thani · See the Thailand profile

Top 66% 56/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Thai and UK researchers built WebThai2Access, a 15-criterion WCAG-based checklist tool for Thai-language sites, then validated it against real user experience across 120 participants — 30 each of developers, hearing-impaired, visually impaired and elderly users.

WebThai2Access — Co-Tested Web Accessibility Checker for Thai-Language Sites

Details

Promoter
Suratthani Rajabhat University & University of Southampton
Period
2017–2019
Keywords
higher education, assistive technology, web accessibility

Description

As of the late 2010s, Thai web developers had little accessibility guidance available in their own language, and existing WCAG-based checkers were not adapted to Thai-script content, according to researchers at Suratthani Rajabhat University.
Angkananon, Plodaksorn and Wald (University of Southampton, UK) developed the Thai Evaluation Criteria — a 15-point WCAG 2.0-based checklist — and built WebThai2Access, a tool modelled on the UK's Web2Access platform, letting developers self-test Thai-language sites.
The tool and criteria were validated with 120 participants across four groups of 30: web developers, hearing-impaired users, visually impaired users and elderly users. Developers rated the 15 criteria as reliable and usable. For the three disabled and elderly user groups, the study reports 95% confidence intervals of ±5% (hearing-impaired), ±2% (elderly) and ±0% (visually impaired) around the tool's accessibility predictions, indicating the developer-facing checklist reasonably predicted the real barriers each user group experienced.
Published results describe a validated research prototype rather than a nationally deployed service — no adoption or usage-scale figures for WebThai2Access itself are reported in the available literature.

Read the full analysis: https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/msj/article/view/231809

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful