evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Yongneup of Mt. Daeam — Korea's Only Alpine Peat Moor Ramsar Site (Republic of Korea)

South Korea · Inje · See the South Korea profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 32% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Designated in 1997 as Korea's first Ramsar site, Yongneup on Mt. Daeam is the country's only true alpine peat moor, with 1.5 m of peat accumulated over millennia; a 2025 peer-reviewed 200-plot survey set quantified thresholds now used for long-term monitoring.

1.5 m
Peat depth (accumulated over ~4,000 years)
0.5-1 mm/year
Peat accumulation rate (long-term average)
200 1x1 m plots
Survey quadrats analysed (2025 study)
130 taxa
Herbaceous taxa recorded (2025 study)
9 communities
Distinct plant communities identified (2025 study)
22.0 and 48.3 cm
Peat-depth thresholds for community-composition shifts (2025 study)
8.93 mg/kg
Available-phosphorus threshold for community shift (2025 study)
64.5 %
Organic-matter threshold for community shift (2025 study)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea / Cultural Heritage Administration / Korea Forest Service
Period
1997-present
Keywords
montane peatland conservation, ecological monitoring, Ramsar wetland, protected area management

Context

Yongneup, on the upper slopes of Mt. Daeam (1,280 m) in Inje County, Gangwon Province, is South Korea's only high-altitude peat-forming moor and, since 28 March 1997, the country's first Ramsar-listed wetland (Ramsar Site No. 898). The peat formed over roughly 4,000 years, reaches 1.5 m in depth, and accumulates at only 0.5-1 mm per year. It is jointly protected as a Natural Monument and Ramsar site by the Ministry of Environment, the Cultural Heritage Administration and the Korea Forest Service.

Results

A 2025 peer-reviewed study (Diversity, MDPI) analysed 200 systematically placed 1x1 m quadrats across the moor and its transitional zone, recording 130 herbaceous taxa across nine distinct plant communities. Using CHAID decision-tree analysis, researchers established quantitative environmental thresholds for community-composition shifts: 22.0 cm and 48.3 cm peat depth, 8.93 mg/kg available phosphorus, and 64.5% organic-matter content.

Conclusions

This is protection-and-monitoring evidence rather than an active carbon-payment or large-scale rewetting scheme: no site-specific greenhouse-gas flux or sequestration-rate measurements were found, so the carbon-storage value implied by the slow peat-accumulation rate should be read as indicative, not verified. The site's small size (roughly 210 m by 275 m) also limits how much can be generalised from it, but the rigor of its long-term ecological monitoring is unusual among the world's high-altitude peatlands.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No specific management budget is published; costs are likely limited to conservation research and monitoring given the site's small size and lack of active engineering works.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Continuously protected since 1997 (28+ years); the latest peer-reviewed monitoring was published in 2025.
Staffing & skills
Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea, Cultural Heritage Administration, Korea Forest Service

Conditions for success

  • Joint designation as both a Natural Monument (cultural heritage protection) and a Ramsar wetland since 1997, giving dual legal protection
  • Long-term systematic ecological monitoring (a 200-quadrat peer-reviewed survey in 2025) generating concrete, measurable degradation thresholds for managers

Common failure modes

  • The site's very small size (roughly 210 m by 275 m) limits how much can be generalised, and no independent management-effectiveness evaluation was found despite 25+ years of protected status

Where it fits

Governance type
joint multi-agency state protection (environment, cultural heritage and forestry authorities)
Scale
single small site (a few hectares)
Income level
high income (South Korea)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 93

UK Peatland Code

United Kingdom

The UK's quality-assurance standard for peatland restoration: it issues verified carbon units for rewetting degraded peat, delivering bundled carbon, water …