Pontificia Universidad Javeriana co-designed Youth Collective Minds, a digital mental-health platform for Bogotá's youth, with 146 participants; a 2022-23 field trial of 435 users scored 85 on the System Usability Scale but only 18.8% returned after the first day.
146 people
Total co-design and usability-testing participants (2021–2023)
110 people (75.3%)
Participants contributing to platform development (2021–2023)
Feasibility study participants (feasibility study)
72.86 SUS points
Beta prototype System Usability Scale score (feasibility study) (feasibility study)
2.85 NPS points
Net Promoter Score (feasibility study) (feasibility study)
83 % (29/35)
Testers who said they would reuse the platform (feasibility study)
435 users (314 registered, 121 anonymous)
Naturalistic trial users (Jul 2022–Oct 2023)
85.0 SUS points
Beta version System Usability Scale score (naturalistic trial) (Jul 2022–Oct 2023)
18.8 %
Users returning after their first day (Jul 2022–Oct 2023)
26.5 % (27/102)
Telecounseling completion rate among those offered it (Jul 2022–Oct 2023)
Details
Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health
Period
2021-2023
Keywords
digital health, youth mental health, participatory co-design
Context
Facing high unmet emotional-distress needs among young people in Bogotá and few digital mental-health tools built with Colombian youth rather than for them, the Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health at Pontificia Universidad Javeriana's School of Medicine, funded by Fondation Botnar, set out to co-design a youth-facing platform through direct participation of the target users.
Objectives
The goal was to build a platform — Youth Collective Minds (Mentes Colectivas para Jóvenes, YMC) — combining psychoeducational resources, an avatar-based interface and optional telecounseling to support self-management and help-seeking, shaped directly by young co-designers rather than imposed on them.
Activities
Across the design and testing phases, 146 people took part: 110 (75.3%) contributed to developing platform components and 36 (24.7%) took part in usability testing. A related feasibility study ran 19 co-design workshops with 35 further participants, testing both the YMC web platform and a companion smartphone app, Mental Beat.
Results
In the feasibility study, YMC's beta prototype scored 72.86 on the System Usability Scale and a Net Promoter Score of 2.85; 83% of testers said they would reuse it, with psychoeducational resources the most-used feature (100%) and telecounseling the least used (8.6%). In a subsequent naturalistic trial (July 2022–October 2023) of 435 users, the platform's beta version scored 85.0 on the SUS and most users reported clinically relevant emotional distress, but only 18.8% of users returned after their first day, and of those offered telecounseling, just 26.5% completed it.
Conclusions
The research team published the low first-day return rate and low telecounseling-completion figures alongside the favourable usability scores, and both papers frame post-launch engagement as the platform's main unresolved challenge for future iterations.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — University-led development and field trial funded by a single Fondation Botnar grant (REG-19-026), covering co-design workshops, platform/app build and a multi-year naturalistic trial.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Co-design and testing phase (146 participants) followed by a feasibility study and a 15-month naturalistic field trial (July 2022–October 2023), with results published through two 2025 papers.
Staffing & skills
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health team, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana School of Medicine, 146 co-design and usability-testing participants drawn from the target youth population, Telecounseling service staff for users opting into that feature
Conditions for success
Participatory co-design with the target population from the outset (110 contributing to development, 36 to usability testing)
Combining psychoeducation, an avatar-based interface and optional telecounseling into one platform
Sustained grant funding (Fondation Botnar) enabling a 15-month naturalistic field trial rather than a short pilot
Common failure modes
Only 18.8% of users returned after their first day in the naturalistic trial
Just 26.5% (27 of 102) of users offered telecounseling completed it, with technical issues cited as a barrier to engagement
Telecounseling was the least-used feature (8.6%) despite being a core intended service
Where it fits
Governance type
university-led research programme, grant-funded
Scale
city (Bogotá)
Income level
upper-middle-income
Commonly funded by
Philanthropic / foundation funding
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.