evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

zeroCARBON Community Agroforestry Programme (Petén, Guatemala)

Guatemala · Flores · See the Guatemala profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 64% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Plan Vivo-certified agroforestry programme restoring degraded pasture in Petén, Guatemala since 2019; a genuine, certified effort, but the developer's own reported scale and CO2 figures vary three- to four-fold across its materials.

1.3 million
Trees planted (general communications, unreconciled with Plan Vivo scope) (since 2019)
683,000 tonnes
CO2 absorbed cumulatively (general communications, unreconciled) (since 2019)
106 communities
Communities involved (general communications) (since 2019)
209 participants across 9 municipalities
Registered participants (Plan Vivo project-specific reporting) (current)
zeroCARBON Community Agroforestry Programme (Petén, Guatemala)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
zeroCO2
Period
2019-present
Keywords
agroforestry, reforestation, Plan Vivo, smallholder livelihoods, deforestation

Context

zeroCARBON is a Plan Vivo-certified agroforestry and reforestation programme run since 2019 by the Guatemalan-founded social enterprise zeroCO2 with farming communities in the Petén department of Guatemala, a region that lost roughly 20% of its forest cover between 2001 and 2020 to cattle ranching and monoculture expansion.

Objectives

Convert degraded pasture into productive tree cover by providing participating families with fruit, timber and native tree seedlings (including cacao, avocado, cedar and mahogany) together with agroforestry training.

Activities

Implemented in partnership with the NGO Comparte ONLUS, delivering seedlings and agroforestry training to farming families across the Petén department.

Results

Published figures for the programme's scale vary across zeroCO2's own communications: general 'Resistance through reforestation' materials cite 106 communities, roughly 4,000 families, 1.3 million trees planted and an estimated 683,000 tonnes of CO2 absorbed cumulatively since 2019, while Plan Vivo project-specific reporting elsewhere lists a narrower scope of around 46 communities and 209 registered participants across nine municipalities.

Conclusions

This gap suggests the wider figures describe zeroCO2's total reforestation activity, of which only part is Plan Vivo-registered and carbon-verified; no single, independently reconciled figure for verified tonnes of CO2 or issued Plan Vivo certificates was found in the sources reviewed. The programme is a genuine, multi-year, third-party-certified community reforestation effort, but its core carbon and participation metrics are inconsistently reported.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No cost or budget figures are stated in the source; cost_band inferred as low, typical of smallholder seedling-and-training agroforestry models, pending disclosed figures.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Programme has run continuously since 2019 (7+ years to date); timeline_band set to long based on this stated ongoing operation.
Staffing & skills
zeroCO2 (Guatemalan social enterprise) — implementing organisation, Comparte ONLUS — partner NGO

Conditions for success

  • Plan Vivo certification and continuous multi-year operation
  • distribution of seedlings and agroforestry training to participating farming families

Common failure modes

  • inconsistent self-reported scale and carbon figures across the developer's own materials (three- to four-fold variation) undermine reconciliation and verification

Where it fits

Governance type
social enterprise led, with NGO partnership and community participation
Scale
community/smallholder (dozens of communities across Petén)
Income level
lower-middle-income (Guatemala)

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful