evidoria

What works in Guatemala

All catalogues

19
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
31%
strong evidence, of 16 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Guatemala

The evidence demonstrates several successful interventions across rural and urban Guatemala. [safe+natal]'s smartphone app increased high-risk pregnancy referral rates from 20 to 33 per 100 births among traditional midwives, now reaching ~800 births annually across 40 midwife partners, while [Abriendo Oportunidades]' mentorship network has reached over 25,000 Indigenous girls, with 72% of participants remaining in school by age 16–17 compared to 29% nationally. [Digital Community Centers] in Huehuetenango have reached 4,000+ Mayan women with significant digital-literacy skill gains (p<0.001), and [Barrio Mío]'s disaster-risk-reduction model directly served 3,600+ households in Mixco before being replicated by the municipal government in 15 additional communities. However, the practices focus on specific populations and geographies; they do not provide comprehensive or representative coverage of outcomes across Guatemala as a whole.

Drawn from: safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · Digital Community Centers (DCCs) – New Sun Road, Huehuetenango · Abriendo Oportunidades ('Opening Opportunities') — Mentorship Network for Indigenous Girls in Guatemala · Barrio Mío — Guatemala's Pilot-Test-Replicate Model for Disaster-Resilient Neighbourhood Upgrading · CMI Alimentos Digital Coaching — App-Based Training for Guatemala's Casas del Pollo Rey Micro-Franchisees · Guatemala's Scalable Early-Warning System for School Dropout Prevention · RITA — Guatemala's AI Tax and Customs Virtual Assistant · GuateCarbon — Community REDD+ in the Maya Biosphere Reserve (Guatemala)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Effectiveness +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +28 pts 33 here · 6 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +15 pts 42 here · 27 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Innovation level +9 pts 71 here · 62 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +9 pts 56 here · 47 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -15 pts 58 here · 74 average

Transferability / replicability -17 pts 43 here · 60 average

Governance, certification & transferability -18 pts 46 here · 64 average

Impact on gender equality -20 pts 50 here · 70 average

Evaluated outcomes -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -45 pts 8 here · 54 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Effectiveness
100 · 66
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
33 · 6
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
42 · 27
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 48
Innovation level
71 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
56 · 47
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 38
Sustainability
79 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured public value
54 · 57
Scalability & sustainability
58 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
42 · 48
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
58 · 74
Transferability / replicability
43 · 60
Governance, certification & transferability
46 · 64
Impact on gender equality
50 · 70
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 78
Efficiency
0 · 32
Transparency, fairness & accountability
8 · 54

Coloured bar: Guatemala. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · 96

Digital Community Centers (DCCs) – New Sun Road, Huehuetenango · 96

Abriendo Oportunidades ('Opening Opportunities') — Mentorship Network for Indigenous Girls in Guatemala · 82

Barrio Mío — Guatemala's Pilot-Test-Replicate Model for Disaster-Resilient Neighbourhood Upgrading · 76

CMI Alimentos Digital Coaching — App-Based Training for Guatemala's Casas del Pollo Rey Micro-Franchisees · 67

Guatemala's Scalable Early-Warning System for School Dropout Prevention · 67

RITA — Guatemala's AI Tax and Customs Virtual Assistant · 60

GuateCarbon — Community REDD+ in the Maya Biosphere Reserve (Guatemala) · 60

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Guatemala concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more