evidoria

What works in Guatemala

All catalogues

12
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
18%
strong evidence, of 11 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Guatemala

Guatemala's evidence base spans digital inclusion, disaster resilience, education, tax administration, and environmental conservation. Digital Community Centers have reached 4,000+ Mayan women with significant digital skill gains, while an early-warning system achieved a 4% relative reduction in school dropout across 4,000 schools at under US$3 per student. The Barrio Mío neighbourhood-upgrading model directly benefited 3,600+ households in two Mixco settlements and was subsequently replicated by municipal government in 15 further communities, and RITA, the tax authority's AI assistant, served over 1.1 million queries in a single quarter of 2023 with 92.35% satisfaction. These practices demonstrate scalable interventions in governance, education, infrastructure and livelihoods, though the evidence base does not quantify broader national outcomes or comparative effectiveness across sectors.

Drawn from: Digital Community Centers (DCCs) – New Sun Road, Huehuetenango · Barrio Mío — Guatemala's Pilot-Test-Replicate Model for Disaster-Resilient Neighbourhood Upgrading · Guatemala's Scalable Early-Warning System for School Dropout Prevention · RITA — Guatemala's AI Tax and Customs Virtual Assistant · GuateCarbon — Community REDD+ in the Maya Biosphere Reserve (Guatemala) · Guatemala PINFOR / PROBOSQUE National Forest Incentives · Guatemala's Defensoría de la Mujer Indígena (DEMI) — State Institution for Indigenous Women's Rights and Services (1999–present) · Ciudad Cayalá — A New Urbanist District Confronting Guatemala City's Sprawl

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +26 pts 33 here · 7 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +11 pts 42 here · 31 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Governance, certification & transferability +9 pts 73 here · 64 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +8 pts 58 here · 50 average

Weaknesses

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -9 pts 42 here · 51 average

Inclusiveness / equity -20 pts 22 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -20 pts 56 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
33 · 7
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
42 · 31
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Governance, certification & transferability
73 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 50
Innovation level
70 · 63
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 48
Sustainability
80 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured public value
58 · 59
Scalability & sustainability
61 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Transferability / replicability
53 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
42 · 51
Inclusiveness / equity
22 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
56 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Efficiency
0 · 44
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 84

Coloured bar: Guatemala. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Digital Community Centers (DCCs) – New Sun Road, Huehuetenango · 96

Barrio Mío — Guatemala's Pilot-Test-Replicate Model for Disaster-Resilient Neighbourhood Upgrading · 76

Guatemala's Scalable Early-Warning System for School Dropout Prevention · 67

RITA — Guatemala's AI Tax and Customs Virtual Assistant · 60

GuateCarbon — Community REDD+ in the Maya Biosphere Reserve (Guatemala) · 60

Guatemala PINFOR / PROBOSQUE National Forest Incentives · 60

Guatemala's Defensoría de la Mujer Indígena (DEMI) — State Institution for Indigenous Women's Rights and Services (1999–present) · 59

Ciudad Cayalá — A New Urbanist District Confronting Guatemala City's Sprawl · 48

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Guatemala concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more