evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

ZRA AI Unit — Zambia Revenue Authority's Machine-Learning Customs Risk Model

Zambia · Lusaka · See the Zambia profile · See the Lusaka profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 75% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Zambia Revenue Authority's AI Unit is piloting a Random Forest ML model, adapted from a Paraguay customs deployment, to flag high-risk import declarations for inspection, targeting an estimated 47–56% customs tax gap; rigorous pilot results are still pending.

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA), AI Unit, with UC Berkeley's Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA)
Period
AI Unit since 2023; ML customs pilot November 2025–ongoing
Keywords
customs risk management, tax administration, machine learning, revenue collection, public-private research partnership

Context

Since around 2023, the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) has operated an in-house 'AI Unit' tasked with modernising tax and customs administration through machine learning. In partnership with UC Berkeley's Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA), the unit adapted a Random Forest model — previously piloted on Paraguayan customs data — to flag high-risk import declarations for physical inspection.

Objectives

Address an estimated 47-56% customs tax gap across roughly half a million commercial shipments processed annually, by targeting inspections toward the highest-risk declarations rather than relying on blanket or purely manual checks.

Activities

The customs risk-scoring pilot began around November 2025 and, according to CEGA, is being evaluated through a randomised design. The AI Unit also runs adjacent tools, including a taxpayer chatbot, an HS-code lookup assistant, and automated compliance 'nudges.'

Results

Quantitative results on detection accuracy or revenue recovered specifically attributable to the Random Forest model had not yet been published as of the pilot's start. ZRA and Zambia's Ministry of Technology and Science have separately stated that AI-driven modernisation across the revenue authority's operations contributed to a 60% increase in revenue collection over two years, but that figure describes the broader AI programme rather than this specific model.

Conclusions

The 60% revenue-growth figure has not been independently audited and should be read as an institutional claim about the wider AI programme, not a verified causal result of the customs risk model specifically; randomised pilot results for the model itself are still pending.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No separate budget disclosed; developed via an academic research partnership (CEGA) adapting an existing Random Forest model rather than building new infrastructure from scratch.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — The AI Unit has operated since around 2023; the customs risk-scoring pilot specifically began around November 2025 and was still in early randomised evaluation at time of writing.
Staffing & skills
Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) AI Unit, UC Berkeley Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA), academic/research partner

Conditions for success

  • academic partnership providing a rigorous (randomised) evaluation design
  • adapting a model already piloted elsewhere (Paraguay) rather than building from scratch
  • a dedicated in-house AI unit within the revenue authority

Common failure modes

  • specific model results are not yet published, so its value beyond the pilot is unproven
  • the broader 60% revenue-growth claim conflates the whole AI programme with this specific model and is unaudited
  • full feature weightings and validation data are not public, limiting external transparency

Where it fits

Governance type
national revenue authority, public-private academic partnership
Scale
national customs operations (pilot subset)
Income level
lower-middle-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful