Browse practices

Catalogue: PES & Nature-Based Solutions clear

This selection at a glance

matching practices

12%

strong evidence, of 8 assessed

Quasi-experimental 1

Observational / pre–post 4

Descriptive / self-reported 3

Most practices in: Norway (8)

8 result(s) Sort Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List

Title	Evidence	Standing	Type	Location	Scale
Oslo's Blue-Green Factor — A Mandatory Stormwater & Greenery Score for New Developments	Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported	Top 32% 53/100	Good practice	Oslo, Norway	—
Frivillig Skogvern — Norway Voluntary Forest Conservation Payments	Evidence: Quasi-experimental	Top 32% 53/100	Good practice	Oslo, Norway	—
National Mire Restoration Programme — Norway	Evidence: Observational / pre–post	Top 63% 40/100	Good practice	Trondheim, Norway	—
State-Funded Pink Salmon (Pukkellaks) Trapping Programme — Tana River (Norway)	Evidence: Observational / pre–post	Top 90% 27/100	Good practice	Tana, Norway	—
Use of insurance loss data by local authorities in Norway	Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported	—	Good practice	Norway	—
Restoration and climate adaptation of church ruins, Holla, Norway	Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported	—	Good practice	Norway	—
Multi-Hazard approach to early warning system in Sogn og Fjordane, Norway	Evidence: Observational / pre–post	—	Good practice	Norway	—
New Førde Hospital: Measures for flood protection	Evidence: Observational / pre–post	—	Good practice	Norway	—