Browse practices

Topic: Regulatory sandboxes clear · back to the knowledge map

Search

Subject All subjects All of Governance & Public Services Digital government & service delivery Transparency & integrity Democratic resilience & participation All of Education, Skills & Work School & higher education VET, reskilling & lifelong learning Labour market & future of work All of Equality & Social Inclusion Gender equality & leadership GBV & domestic-violence prevention Disability & accessibility Digital inclusion Migrant integration Poverty & social protection All of Health & Care Public health & prevention Care systems & ageing Health security All of Cities, Housing & Mobility Urban innovation & experimentation Affordable housing Mobility & public space All of Climate, Environment & Biodiversity Climate adaptation & resilience Nature-based solutions & ecosystem services Biodiversity & restoration Water All of Energy & Resources Energy transition & communities Energy security Circular economy & critical materials All of Economy, Innovation & Productivity SME modernisation & productivity Innovation ecosystems Digital finance & assets Trade & supply resilience (public policy) All of Resilience, Security & Preparedness Civil protection & population preparedness Critical-entity resilience Community & societal resilience

Type All Good practiceLiterature / resource

Scale All LocalRegionalNationalTransnational

Country

Evidence All Randomised controlled trialQuasi-experimentalObservational / pre–postDescriptive / self-reported

Funding All AMIF — Asylum, Migration and Integration FundCERV — Citizens, Equality, Rights and ValuesDigital Europe ProgrammeERDF — European Regional Development FundESF+ — European Social Fund PlusErasmus+European Urban InitiativeHorizon EuropeInterreg (European Territorial Cooperation)InvestEULIFE ProgrammeNational / regional programmesOwn resources / municipal budgetPhilanthropic / foundation fundingRecovery and Resilience Facility (national plans)

Filter

• Filters:
• Subject: Regulatory sandboxes ×remove
• Clear all

This selection at a glance

1

matching practices

0%

strong evidence, of 1 assessed

Evidence mix

Descriptive / self-reported

1

Most practices in: Germany (1)

Results

Select	Title	Evidence	Standing	Type	Location	Scale
	Trilateral KI-Reallabor Pilot — Germany's Simulated AI Regulatory Sandbox for High-Risk Medical AI	Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported	Top 24% 73/100	Good practice	Wiesbaden, Germany	—