Parc national de Kolkheti — Protection des zones humides Ramsar et restauration de la forêt colchique classée UNESCO (Géorgie)
Géorgie
Un parc côtier de zones humides en Géorgie, soutenu par la Banque mondiale et le FEM, protège des zones humides …
Royaume-Uni · Voir le profil de Royaume-Uni
Preuves: Descriptif / auto-déclaré · Demandez à Evidence Copilot à propos de cette pratique
The potential impacts of climate change include more frequent and intense storms, which in combination with flooding and sea level rise, combine to create storm surges. According to the UK Climate Projections 2009 medium scenario projection (UKCP09), sea levels along the UK coast are expected to rise by as much as 0.75 m in the next 100 years, along with a projected increase in coastal flooding and storm surge events. The impacts of such events on energy infrastructure are significant. They include damage caused to supply lines, such as port infrastructure, and impacts to coastal or river-based power stations themselves. For example, Immingham port lost power in significant areas during a storm surge events of 2013 due to localised flooding in sub-stations.
The objectives of adapting infrastructure at Drax Power and at associated terminals are to ensure resilience to storm surge impacts in the long term, thereby ensuring that Drax Power is able to supply power securely. Furthermore, the multi-port strategy not only alleviated threats of supply chain backlog in weather-related events, but it also greatly increased the import capacity for biomass supply.
Drax Power has implemented numerous adaptation measures to combat the impacts of storm surge and flooding events on its operations. These include structurally raising power plant equipment above potential storm surge water levels as well as constructing sea walls for protection at their Immingham terminal. Furthermore, subterranean tunnels have been fitted with storm surge barriers, while future tunnel constructions will take place above ground level. At Immingham, the outer lock gate has been upgraded to withstand 1 in 1,000 year flood events, with previous gates able to withstand 1 in 20 year tidal flooding events (under UKCP09 medium emission scenario). Such improvements to flood defences were made through joint investments by Associated British Ports (the owner and operator of The Port of Immingham) and Drax Power. Similar measures have been implemented at the Port of Liverpool and the Port of Hull, where the investments were underwritten by the port themselves. To further adapt to flood-related impacts, the transportation of biomass pellets from all ports to power plants takes place by diesel-powered trains, avoiding any need for cables which can also be damaged during storms. Finally, Drax has also adopted a geographically-based adaptation strategy to avoid the impacts of localised storm surges through a multi-port strategy. The strategy has seen biomass port terminals dispersed throughout the UK, with terminals fitted with biomass handling equipment at the Ports of Tyne, Liverpool, Hull and Immingham.
The geographical splitting of biomass supply between multiple ports on both the East and West coasts of the UK reduces the risk of climate events on an interrupted fuel supply. The strategy also allows larger biomass fuel imports to take place, permitting further conversion of the Drax power plant from coal to biomass. Drax can now receive shipments from ships with 65,000 tonne capacities due to investments made by the ports underwritten by long-term contracts with Drax. For example, Drax has invested £135m (€150m) at Immingham to facilitate efficient transport of biomass from the US. The Port of Immingham has invested £4.7 million in the construction of a new outer dock gate to protect against 1 in 1000 year flooding events, and £0.5 million in flood resilience works to electrical substations. Furthermore, when Drax reaches maximum capacity with the projected conversion of a fourth power plant later this year, they find themselves in the unique position of being able to assist other biofuel operators with biomass stocks in times of need. A storm surge in 2013 caused a loss of biomass deliveries to the Drax power plant. As a results, coal was used in order to continue generating power. By now, all of Drax’s boilers run exclusively on 100% biomass. Therefore, assuring a continued biomass supply and preventing damage to biomass stocks from flooding is imperative to their business. If a flooding event such as in 2013 happened today, without adaptation measures, the expected costs to Drax due to loss of operations would be £1 million/day. If the fuel shortage were to lead to power cuts, the wider societal costs would be much higher.
The geographic spread of ports and flood management measures in ports has allowed Drax to increase its import capacity from the US for wood pellet biomass up to 2 million tonnes per year. There is some controversy regarding the climate benefits as well as biodiversity impacts of the fuel change from fossil fuels to biomass at Drax power plants. Drax is committed to sourcing wood (predominantly harvesting residues and low-value roundwood) from working forests rather than primary forests, and to ensure that the environmental benefits of such forests are maintained (through, for example, tree planting). However, the use of predominantly US forest biomass has attracted some criticism from non-governmental organisations in the US who believe that increased biofuel demand in general, and the increased demand for wood pellets from Drax in particular, is responsible for damage to forest habitats and may even increase GHG emissions. The EEA is not able to take a position in this complex debate, which involves government agencies, non-governmental organisations, certification service providers as well as further experts and stakeholders. The adaptation benefits of this project are not controversial, and they seem transferable to other regions and projects. However, the debate about the wider sustainability aspects of Drax’s biomass strategy stresses that there can be synergies as well as trade-offs between climate change adaptation, mitigation and other environmental and social concerns. The development of adaptation strategies by public and private actors needs to consider those concerns comprehensively in order to avoid maladaptation. As part of its continuous work aiming to improve Climate-ADAPT contents, EEA will evaluate if additional information is available to review these aspects.
Les détails de mise en œuvre (coût, calendrier, personnel, conditions de réussite) ne sont pas encore disponibles pour cette pratique.
Vous portez cette pratique ? Revendiquez-la — les porteurs vérifiés obtiennent un contact public sur la page et peuvent proposer des corrections.
D'où proviennent les informations de cette pratique, et quand.
Géorgie
Un parc côtier de zones humides en Géorgie, soutenu par la Banque mondiale et le FEM, protège des zones humides …
Colombie
Le projet Vida Manglar, mené par Conservation International et des partenaires colombiens, protège et restaure les mangroves de la baie …
Viêt Nam
Depuis 1978, Hô-Chi-Minh-Ville a replanté environ 20 000 ha de mangroves défoliées par les herbicides de guerre américains, obtenant la …
Sierra Leone
En octobre 2025, 124 communautés de l'île de Sherbro, Sierra Leone, ont signé un accord de carbone bleu de 50 …
Ouvrir le copilote complet Fondé sur des pratiques citées — vérifiez toujours les sources.