evidoria

What works in Addis Ababa

All catalogues · Ethiopia profile

10
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
20%
strong evidence, of 10 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Scalability & sustainability +14 pts 80 here · 66 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Innovation level +9 pts 73 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -11 pts 56 here · 66 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -13 pts 67 here · 80 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Curator validation -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Evaluated outcomes -34 pts 50 here · 84 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -36 pts 17 here · 53 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Scalability & sustainability
80 · 66
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Innovation level
73 · 64
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Equity & inclusion
56 · 54
Transferability / demonstrated replication
58 · 59
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 39
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 30
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 41
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 60
Governance, capability & sustainability
56 · 66
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 78
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 80
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Curator validation
50 · 75
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 84
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
17 · 53
Efficiency
0 · 52

Coloured bar: Addis Ababa. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Ethiopia's Joint Land Certification Programme for Women's Land Rights · 85

Five Million Ethiopian Coders Initiative – National Digital Skills Programme · 76

Ethiopia Kaizen Institute — Building a National Continuous-Improvement System · 67

GlobeDock Academy — Offline AI Learning for Rural Ethiopian Secondary Students · 67

Yegenew Sanitary Services Cooperative — Disability-Led Women's Enterprise in Addis Ababa · 59

Fayda — Ethiopia's National Biometric Digital ID for 90 Million · 53

Ethiopian Coders Initiative — National AI and Data-Science Micro-Credentials via Udacity · 40

Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme — Public Works Payments for Watershed & Rangeland Rehabilitation · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more