What works in Brussels
All catalogues · Belgium profile· United Kingdom profile
This profile covers practices recorded under this city name in 2 countries — check each practice's own page for its exact location.
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy +21 pts 58 here · 37 average
Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +16 pts 70 here · 54 average
Documented learning +16 pts 90 here · 74 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +15 pts 89 here · 74 average
Transferability / replicability +15 pts 75 here · 60 average
Scalability beyond pilot +14 pts 77 here · 62 average
Inclusiveness / equity +13 pts 56 here · 43 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +11 pts 58 here · 47 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average
Impact on gender equality +9 pts 80 here · 71 average
Weaknesses
Efficiency -13 pts 20 here · 33 average
Demonstrated reach -16 pts 60 here · 76 average
Evaluation evidence -39 pts 10 here · 49 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Brussels. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
AnySurfer — Belgium's National Digital Accessibility Label · 92
Belgium's 2011 Board Gender Quota Law — Quadrupling Women's Board Seats · 89
EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970/EU) · 89
MiningWatch — Belgium's Data-Mining Tool for Targeting Social-Fraud Inspections · 87
Belgium's Gender Pay Gap Law: Mandatory Biennial Reporting and Action Plans · 85
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more