evidoria

What works in Belgium

All catalogues

97
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
1%
strong evidence, of 87 assessed
4
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Belgium

Belgium has implemented several initiatives to advance equity and inclusion. Belgium's 2011 Board Gender Quota Law mandated one-third of board seats for the under-represented gender, resulting in women's board representation rising from roughly 8% in 2008 to over 33% by 2020. At the municipal level, Leuven 2030 demonstrates a quadruple-helix governance model for climate action, growing from 60 founding members to over 600 partners and winning the €1 million European Capital of Innovation award in 2020. Digital accessibility has been advancing through AnySurfer, Belgium's national accessibility label, which has audited and publicly listed 60 websites against WCAG standards since 2001.

Drawn from: Women Political Leaders · AnySurfer — Belgium's National Digital Accessibility Label · Leuven 2030 — quadruple-helix climate-neutral city experiment · Belgium's 2011 Board Gender Quota Law — Quadrupling Women's Board Seats · EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970/EU) · D&I: female talent pipeline · Digital Inclusion Barometer — Belgium's King Baudouin Foundation Tracks Digital Vulnerability Across Editions · MiningWatch — Belgium's Data-Mining Tool for Targeting Social-Fraud Inspections

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +30 pts 78 here · 48 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +23 pts 61 here · 38 average

Efficiency +23 pts 55 here · 32 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Effectiveness +20 pts 87 here · 66 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Impact on gender equality +18 pts 88 here · 70 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +16 pts 70 here · 54 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +13 pts 87 here · 74 average

Transferability / replicability +13 pts 73 here · 60 average

Documented learning +13 pts 87 here · 74 average

Scalability +12 pts 74 here · 62 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Curator validation +11 pts 84 here · 73 average

Weaknesses

Demonstrated reach -17 pts 58 here · 76 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Evaluation evidence -39 pts 10 here · 49 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
78 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
61 · 38
Efficiency
55 · 32
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Effectiveness
87 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Impact on gender equality
88 · 70
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
70 · 54
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
87 · 74
Transferability / replicability
73 · 60
Documented learning
87 · 74
Scalability
74 · 62
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Curator validation
84 · 73
Achievement / evidence
93 · 87
Inclusiveness / equity
49 · 43
Innovation level
68 · 62
Governance, capability & sustainability
69 · 64
Sustainability
82 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured results
59 · 57
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 26
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Demonstrated reach
58 · 76
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Evaluation evidence
10 · 49

Coloured bar: Belgium. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Women Political Leaders · 96

AnySurfer — Belgium's National Digital Accessibility Label · 92

Leuven 2030 — quadruple-helix climate-neutral city experiment · 91

Belgium's 2011 Board Gender Quota Law — Quadrupling Women's Board Seats · 89

EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970/EU) · 89

D&I: female talent pipeline · 89

Digital Inclusion Barometer — Belgium's King Baudouin Foundation Tracks Digital Vulnerability Across Editions · 88

MiningWatch — Belgium's Data-Mining Tool for Targeting Social-Fraud Inspections · 87

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Belgium concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more