evidoria

What works in Canberra

All catalogues · Australia profile

21
evaluated practices
64/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 16 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Canberra

Australia's capital and federal government (Canberra) has pioneered large-scale AI and digital service trials. Australia's Whole-of-Government Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial saw over 5,000 public service staff across almost 60 agencies save up to an hour per day, with 77% satisfaction and 86% wanting to continue using the tool after the trial ended. Australia's AI Transparency Statements shows the federal government required 94 agencies to publish AI-use disclosures after an independent audit found compliance gaps. The evidence demonstrates Canberra's commitment to testing generative AI tools at scale and establishing transparency frameworks, though the practices quantify outcomes primarily for the Copilot trial rather than broader city-level impacts.

Drawn from: Australia's Whole-of-Government Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial · Be Connected · Carer Gateway — National Digital and Phone Support Service for Unpaid Carers · National Relay Service — Auslan Video Relay Service (Australia) · Australia's AI Transparency Statements — a Mandatory Register Built After an Independent Audit Found Compliance Gaps · Australia's 10 Days' Paid Family and Domestic Violence Leave — a World-First Universal National Entitlement · Australia's AI Assurance Framework Pilot — Testing AI Risk Assessment Across 21 Federal Agencies · Australia's Digital Inclusion Standard — Mandatory Whole-of-Government Inclusive Design

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +26 pts 75 here · 49 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +17 pts 70 here · 54 average

Scalability beyond pilot +17 pts 79 here · 62 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +16 pts 73 here · 57 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -9 pts 53 here · 62 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -14 pts 75 here · 89 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Effectiveness -42 pts 25 here · 68 average

Inclusiveness / equity -43 pts 0 here · 43 average

Impact on gender equality -46 pts 25 here · 71 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
75 · 49
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 74
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Transparency, fairness & accountability
70 · 54
Scalability beyond pilot
79 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured public value
73 · 57
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Transferability / demonstrated replication
64 · 60
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Evaluated outcomes
75 · 79
Sustainability (ongoing)
74 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Efficiency
25 · 33
Innovation level
53 · 62
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 28
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
75 · 89
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Curator validation
50 · 73
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Effectiveness
25 · 68
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 43
Impact on gender equality
25 · 71
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 48

Coloured bar: Canberra. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Australia's Whole-of-Government Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial · 93

Be Connected · 92

Carer Gateway — National Digital and Phone Support Service for Unpaid Carers · 88

National Relay Service — Auslan Video Relay Service (Australia) · 88

Australia's AI Transparency Statements — a Mandatory Register Built After an Independent Audit Found Compliance Gaps · 87

Australia's 10 Days' Paid Family and Domestic Violence Leave — a World-First Universal National Entitlement · 85

Australia's AI Assurance Framework Pilot — Testing AI Risk Assessment Across 21 Federal Agencies · 80

Australia's Digital Inclusion Standard — Mandatory Whole-of-Government Inclusive Design · 72

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more