evidoria

What works in Chicago

All catalogues · United States of America profile

6
evaluated practices
51/100
average quality score
25%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Chicago

Chicago has deployed data-driven approaches to improve public health and urban infrastructure. Chicago's food inspection forecasting model used machine learning to rank restaurants by violation risk, catching 69% of critical violations in the first half of inspections versus 55% under standard practice, and finding problems roughly 7.5 days earlier. The Array of Things sensor network, developed by Argonne National Lab and the University of Chicago starting in 2016, deployed open-source sensors across the city to measure air quality, noise, heat, light and traffic, with the underlying platform later expanded to place 115 air-quality sensors on bus shelters through Project Eclipse. Evidence on these initiatives is strongest for engineering performance and operational deployment; documented policy impact remains more limited.

Drawn from: Chicago's Food Inspection Forecasting Model — Ranking Restaurants by Violation Risk to Catch Problems Sooner · U.S. Soccer's $24M Equal-Pay Settlement and Identical Collective Bargaining Agreements (2022) · Array of Things — Chicago's Open-Source Urban Sensor Network · UChicago Law's 'Rethinking Legal Education' Strategy — Coordinated Device Ban Across All Nine 1L Courses · Chicago Green Alleys — Permeable-Pavement Alley Reconstruction, ~400 Built and Unevenly Sited · Chicago's Strategic Subject List — A Decade of Predictive Policing Without Evidence It Reduced Violence

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Innovation +38 pts 100 here · 62 average

Effectiveness +32 pts 100 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average

Transferability / replicability -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Scalability -12 pts 50 here · 62 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Innovation
100 · 62
Effectiveness
100 · 68
Impact on gender equality
100 · 71
Curator validation
100 · 73
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 57
Sustainability
83 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Governance, capability & sustainability
56 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Transferability / replicability
50 · 60
Scalability
50 · 62
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 28
Efficiency
0 · 33
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 48
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 89

Coloured bar: Chicago. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Chicago's Food Inspection Forecasting Model — Ranking Restaurants by Violation Risk to Catch Problems Sooner · 80

U.S. Soccer's $24M Equal-Pay Settlement and Identical Collective Bargaining Agreements (2022) · 74

Array of Things — Chicago's Open-Source Urban Sensor Network · 71

UChicago Law's 'Rethinking Legal Education' Strategy — Coordinated Device Ban Across All Nine 1L Courses · 33

Chicago Green Alleys — Permeable-Pavement Alley Reconstruction, ~400 Built and Unevenly Sited · 27

Chicago's Strategic Subject List — A Decade of Predictive Policing Without Evidence It Reduced Violence · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more