evidoria

What works in Copenhagen

All catalogues · Denmark profile

29
evaluated practices
75/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 29 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Copenhagen

The evidence shows several gender equality initiatives operating in Copenhagen and Denmark. PWN Copenhagen is a local chapter of a global professional women's network offering education, networking and mentorship to advance gender-balanced leadership, though no outcome evaluation of its impact is described. Girl Power - Denmark operates football-based empowerment programs for girls aged 8-10 through local club partnerships, and With Purpose - Startup School addresses the Nordic gender gap in entrepreneurship through workshops and mentorship for female founders. At the policy level, Denmark's earmarked parental leave law achieved measurable results, with fathers' average leave doubling from ~5 to ~10 weeks and a 60% increase in fathers claiming benefits by July 2025, narrowing the parental income gap between partners.

Drawn from: Girl Power - Denmark · With Purpose - Startup School · KVINFO · PWN Copenhagen · Denmark's Earmarked Parental Leave for Fathers — Act No. 679/2022 · Specialisterne — Assessment-Based IT Careers for Autistic and Neurodivergent Adults · Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Transparency, ethics & data protection +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 40 average

Transferability / replicability +19 pts 78 here · 59 average

Inclusiveness / equity +19 pts 60 here · 41 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Innovation level +18 pts 83 here · 64 average

Curator validation +18 pts 93 here · 75 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +17 pts 83 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Sustainability +16 pts 95 here · 80 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +15 pts 93 here · 78 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +10 pts 44 here · 35 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Documented learning -13 pts 60 here · 73 average

Evaluation evidence -16 pts 20 here · 36 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, ethics & data protection
100 · 50
Efficiency
100 · 52
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 40
Transferability / replicability
78 · 59
Inclusiveness / equity
60 · 41
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Innovation level
83 · 64
Curator validation
93 · 75
Governance, capability & sustainability
83 · 66
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Sustainability
95 · 80
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
93 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
44 · 35
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Demonstrated reach
80 · 75
Scalability
70 · 66
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Evidence of impact / measured results
58 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Documented learning
60 · 73
Evaluation evidence
20 · 36
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54

Coloured bar: Copenhagen. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Girl Power - Denmark · 100

With Purpose - Startup School · 100

KVINFO · 100

PWN Copenhagen · 100

Denmark's Earmarked Parental Leave for Fathers — Act No. 679/2022 · 96

KVINFO · 96

Specialisterne — Assessment-Based IT Careers for Autistic and Neurodivergent Adults · 96

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · 95

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more