evidoria

What works in Kampala

All catalogues · Uganda profile

27
evaluated practices
58/100
average quality score
8%
strong evidence, of 24 assessed
4
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Kampala

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda was developed and tested in Kampala through a cluster RCT (2007–2012) that found 52% lower past-year physical intimate partner violence in intervention communities. AirQo — Makerere University's Low-Cost Air-Quality Sensor Network for African Cities has deployed over 200 air-quality sensors across Kampala and three other African cities, documenting monthly PM2.5 concentrations of 60–100 µg/m³—several times WHO guideline levels—with data backing peer-reviewed pollution research. Both initiatives demonstrate Kampala's role as a hub for evidence-based development interventions in gender-based violence prevention and environmental monitoring, though the practices do not provide broader quantified data on Kampala's overall development outcomes or implementation scale beyond these specific programmes.

Drawn from: SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · ICT4PWD Programme — DPO-Partnered Accessible Digital-Skilling Model · Uganda Rural Household Devices Project – Solar Tablets for Last-Mile Digital Inclusion · AirQo — Makerere University's Low-Cost Air-Quality Sensor Network for African Cities · Uganda's Gender and Equity Certificate — Mandatory Compliance Scoring for the National Budget · Women Mean Business — TechnoServe's Coaching and Mentoring Programme for Women Entrepreneurs in Kampala · Solar Sister: Training Women as Last-Mile Clean-Energy Entrepreneurs in East and West Africa · eCitie — Kampala's GIS-Based Digital Property Tax System

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Effectiveness +32 pts 100 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Evidence of learning impact +18 pts 44 here · 26 average

Efficiency +17 pts 50 here · 33 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +17 pts 44 here · 28 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Inclusiveness / equity +10 pts 52 here · 43 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +9 pts 67 here · 57 average

Transferability / replicability +9 pts 69 here · 60 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 62 here · 74 average

Sustainability -14 pts 65 here · 78 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -14 pts 75 here · 89 average

Evaluation evidence -15 pts 33 here · 49 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -26 pts 22 here · 48 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -26 pts 11 here · 37 average

Score profile vs peers

Effectiveness
100 · 68
Impact on gender equality
100 · 71
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Evidence of learning impact
44 · 26
Efficiency
50 · 33
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
44 · 28
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Inclusiveness / equity
52 · 43
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 57
Transferability / replicability
69 · 60
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
56 · 48
Demonstrated reach
83 · 76
Innovation level
61 · 62
Scalability beyond pilot
60 · 62
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Governance, capability & sustainability
57 · 64
Documented learning
67 · 74
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
62 · 74
Sustainability
65 · 78
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
75 · 89
Evaluation evidence
33 · 49
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Curator validation
50 · 73
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
22 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
11 · 37

Coloured bar: Kampala. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · 100

ICT4PWD Programme — DPO-Partnered Accessible Digital-Skilling Model · 92

Uganda Rural Household Devices Project – Solar Tablets for Last-Mile Digital Inclusion · 92

AirQo — Makerere University's Low-Cost Air-Quality Sensor Network for African Cities · 91

Uganda's Gender and Equity Certificate — Mandatory Compliance Scoring for the National Budget · 85

Women Mean Business — TechnoServe's Coaching and Mentoring Programme for Women Entrepreneurs in Kampala · 76

Solar Sister: Training Women as Last-Mile Clean-Energy Entrepreneurs in East and West Africa · 74

eCitie — Kampala's GIS-Based Digital Property Tax System · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more