evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

eCitie — Kampala's GIS-Based Digital Property Tax System

Uganda · Kampala · See the Uganda profile · See the Kampala profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 54% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Facing chronically low local revenue, Kampala's KCCA combined a World Bank-funded GIS property survey with eCitie, a self-built online/mobile-money tax platform; reviews report taxable properties identified rising 47%→64% and revenue up 89% in real terms, 2011–2015.

47 %
Taxable properties identified (before GIS survey) (pre-2014)
64 %
Taxable properties identified (after GIS survey) (2014–2019)
89 %
Increase in city revenue in real terms (2011–2015)
30 to 81 billion Ugandan shillings (~US$9m to ~US$24m)
City revenue (2011–2015)
14 to 38 billion Ugandan shillings
Revenue in Central and Nakawa divisions (FY2013/14–FY2018/19)
110,000 businesses
Informal businesses formalised into tax net
83 %
Drop in payments during COVID-19 (April–June 2020 vs prior year)
2.07 million US$
eCitie platform build cost
eCitie — Kampala's GIS-Based Digital Property Tax System eCitie — Kampala's GIS-Based Digital Property Tax System

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), with World Bank / Government of Uganda support (Kampala Institutional and Infrastructure Development Project)
Period
2013–present
Keywords
civic data, municipal finance, property tax, GIS, digital government

Context

Like many African capitals, Kampala historically struggled to raise local revenue because it lacked a reliable register of property ownership and value, and tax collection relied on slow, paper-based, cash-only processes.

Objectives

With World Bank and Government of Uganda financing under the Kampala Institutional and Infrastructure Development Project, KCCA set out to build a reliable property register through a citywide GIS survey and to modernise tax collection through a self-built digital platform.

Activities

Between 2014 and 2019, KCCA carried out a citywide GIS survey, assigning addresses and collecting over 50 ownership and valuation-relevant features for more than 350,000 formal and informal properties. In parallel, KCCA built and funded in-house (about US$2.07 million) eCitie, an open-source web/SMS platform launched in 2013 letting taxpayers view bills and pay via banks or mobile money. A linked business-registration drive brought roughly 110,000 informal businesses into the tax net.

Results

Independent analysis by the International Growth Centre and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy found the share of Kampala's roughly 350,000 properties identified as taxable rose from 47% to 64% after the GIS survey, while city revenue grew from about 30 billion Ugandan shillings (US$9m) in 2011 to 81 billion shillings (US$24m) in 2015, an 89% increase in real terms. In the Central and Nakawa divisions alone, revenue rose from 14 billion to 38 billion shillings between FY2013/14 and FY2018/19. However, compliance remained low because KCCA had limited legal enforcement powers, and revenue collection fell sharply during COVID-19 (an 83% drop in payments, April–June 2020, versus the year before) once in-person outreach stopped.

Conclusions

The case shows digitisation of property records and tax payment channels can substantially raise municipal revenue, but technology alone is not sufficient: sustained gains depend on enforcement capacity and resilient in-person outreach alongside the digital platform.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
KCCA in-house digital team that built and maintains eCitie, GIS survey field teams (World Bank/Government of Uganda-financed, 2014–2019)

Conditions for success

  • Reliable, up-to-date property register (GIS survey) paired with the digital payment platform
  • Legal enforcement powers and in-person outreach capacity to sustain compliance
  • Mobile-money and banking payment rails accessible to taxpayers

Common failure modes

  • Compliance remained low overall because KCCA had limited legal enforcement powers
  • Payments dropped 83% (Apr–Jun 2020) when in-person outreach paused during COVID-19, showing digital tools alone don't sustain compliance

Where it fits

Governance type
municipal government (capital city authority)
Scale
city-wide
Income level
low-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful