evidoria

What works in Lisbon

All catalogues · Portugal profile

40
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 38 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Lisbon

Lisbon has developed multiple innovation and investment support infrastructure initiatives. Smart Open Lisboa has engaged approximately 750 startups from around the world since 2016, producing 75 pilot projects implemented in the city, while Unicorn Factory Lisboa supported over 1,100 companies that collectively raised more than €1 billion by end of 2025. Invest Lisboa has supported over 3,000 investment projects, companies and entrepreneurs since 2009 and ranked second-best in Southern Europe for investment attraction strategy (2016). However, the evidence primarily describes programme outputs and reach rather than outcomes for the city's residents or economy as a whole.

Drawn from: Smart Open Lisboa · Promova · Invest Lisboa · Portugal's Decree-Law 83/2018 — Mandatory Web & App Accessibility with EU-Reported Audits · Unicorn Factory Lisboa · LISPOLIS Polo Tecnológico de Lisboa · BIP/ZIP (Neighborhoods and Priority Intervention Zones) · SPEED UP (Supporting Practices for Entrepreneurship Ecosystems in the Development of Urban Policies)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +38 pts 44 here · 6 average

Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Efficiency +17 pts 50 here · 33 average

Sustainability +16 pts 94 here · 78 average

Inclusiveness / equity +13 pts 56 here · 43 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +11 pts 85 here · 74 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Innovation level +9 pts 71 here · 62 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -16 pts 11 here · 28 average

Documented learning -17 pts 57 here · 74 average

Evaluation evidence -20 pts 29 here · 49 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -26 pts 22 here · 48 average

Demonstrated reach -33 pts 43 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
44 · 6
Impact on gender equality
100 · 71
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Efficiency
50 · 33
Sustainability
94 · 78
Inclusiveness / equity
56 · 43
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
85 · 74
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Innovation level
71 · 62
Effectiveness
75 · 68
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 47
Equity & inclusion
50 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured results
57 · 57
Scalability
59 · 62
Transferability / replicability
56 · 60
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Curator validation
68 · 73
Governance, capability & sustainability
58 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
11 · 28
Documented learning
57 · 74
Evaluation evidence
29 · 49
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
22 · 48
Demonstrated reach
43 · 76

Coloured bar: Lisbon. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Smart Open Lisboa · 95

Promova · 95

Invest Lisboa · 91

Portugal's Decree-Law 83/2018 — Mandatory Web & App Accessibility with EU-Reported Audits · 88

Unicorn Factory Lisboa · 86

LISPOLIS Polo Tecnológico de Lisboa · 86

BIP/ZIP (Neighborhoods and Priority Intervention Zones) · 86

SPEED UP (Supporting Practices for Entrepreneurship Ecosystems in the Development of Urban Policies) · 81

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Read Along (Bolo) — Google's AI reading tutor for low-literacy children in India · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more