evidoria

What works in Portugal

All catalogues

100
evaluated practices
54/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 93 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Portugal

Portugal's evidence base demonstrates multiple initiatives to advance gender equality and civic participation. Participo! promoted women's political and civic participation in Porto parishes through a €240,019 programme combining empowerment actions, mentoring, and citizenship education. Promova achieved concrete results in advancing women to senior management, with 129 participants across 72 companies and a 49% promotion rate across four editions. Corporate-level gender equality plans at Águas de Portugal and GALP align with statutory requirements, with AdP targeting 40% women on its Board of Directors by 2030. These practices show Portugal's approach spans grassroots civic participation, targeted leadership development, and corporate compliance frameworks, though the evidence consists of self-reported programme outputs and targets rather than independently verified outcome measurements.

Drawn from: Participo! · AdP Waters of Portugal - Gender Equality Plan 2024 · GALP - Equality Plan 2024 · Smart Open Lisboa · Promova · Invest Lisboa · Portugal's Decree-Law 83/2018 — Mandatory Web & App Accessibility with EU-Reported Audits

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +43 pts 88 here · 44 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +33 pts 40 here · 7 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +23 pts 73 here · 50 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +16 pts 93 here · 77 average

Inclusiveness / equity +14 pts 56 here · 42 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Sustainability +9 pts 87 here · 78 average

Weaknesses

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes -10 pts 75 here · 84 average

Evidence of learning impact -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 8 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
88 · 44
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
40 · 7
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
73 · 50
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Effectiveness
93 · 77
Inclusiveness / equity
56 · 42
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Sustainability
87 · 78
Innovation level
70 · 63
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
82 · 76
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
97 · 91
Evidence of impact / measured results
64 · 59
Transferability / replicability
63 · 59
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 48
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
52 · 54
Equity & inclusion
50 · 52
Scalability
61 · 64
Documented learning
71 · 74
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
47 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
27 · 31
Curator validation
67 · 74
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
75 · 84
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 28
Evaluation evidence
8 · 44

Coloured bar: Portugal. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Participo! · 98

AdP Waters of Portugal - Gender Equality Plan 2024 · 96

GALP - Equality Plan 2024 · 96

Smart Open Lisboa · 95

Promova · 95

Invest Lisboa · 91

Portugal's Decree-Law 83/2018 — Mandatory Web & App Accessibility with EU-Reported Audits · 88

Gender equality and sustentability Plan · 87

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Portugal concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Empowering Global Leadership: The Role of International Women's Forum Finland in Advancing Women's Leadership and Gender Equality · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more