What works in Msida
All catalogues · Malta profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Msida
LifeMedGreenRoof demonstrated an instrumented green roof in Msida at the University of Malta, measuring stormwater retention over a full hydrological year from July 2016 to June 2017. The monitored 32.61 m² roof achieved per-event water retention ranging from 40% to 100% with a mean of 90%, with only 8 of 74 rain days producing any runoff. However, the study was limited to a particularly dry winter, making it unsuitable for watershed-scale flood mitigation estimates, and the authors explicitly note that broader application to urban flooding requires future work.
Drawn from: Astra: Empowering Women in Business · FAIE — Fair Artificial Intelligence Educator: AI-Adaptive Maths Practice for Maltese Primary Schools · LifeMedGreenRoof — Instrumented Mediterranean Green Roof Stormwater Retention, Msida, Malta
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evidence of learning impact +39 pts 67 here · 28 average
Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average
Sustainability +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +17 pts 67 here · 50 average
Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Weaknesses
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average
Transferability / replicability -26 pts 33 here · 59 average
Scalability & sustainability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average
Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average
Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average
Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Msida. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Astra: Empowering Women in Business · 48
FAIE — Fair Artificial Intelligence Educator: AI-Adaptive Maths Practice for Maltese Primary Schools · 47
LifeMedGreenRoof — Instrumented Mediterranean Green Roof Stormwater Retention, Msida, Malta · 33
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Matches your scale
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Women in Business in Bulgaria · fit 84/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Matches your scale
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Girl Power - Denmark · fit 84/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Matches your scale
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more