What works in Ottawa
All catalogues · Canada profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average
Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +21 pts 75 here · 54 average
Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average
Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average
Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value +14 pts 74 here · 60 average
Scalability beyond pilot +12 pts 78 here · 66 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average
Weaknesses
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Innovation level -44 pts 20 here · 64 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Ottawa. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care System ($10-a-Day Child Care) · 96
Digital Literacy Exchange Program (DLEP) · 88
Canada's Federal Pay Equity Act 2018 — Proactive Equal-Pay Regime for Federally Regulated Workplaces · 85
Assemblyline — Canada's Machine-Learning Malware Triage Platform Defending Government Networks · 80
CDA-AMC's Evaluation of AI Search Tools for Health-Technology-Assessment Evidence Synthesis · 80
IRCC IEC Work Permit Eligibility Model — Canada's AI Tool for Youth Mobility · 80
IRCC's Advanced Analytics Triage — Canada's Predictive System for Visa Application Processing · 73
GCtranslate — Canada's AI Translation Tool Scaling Across the Federal Public Service · 73
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more