evidoria

What works in Canada

All catalogues

63
evaluated practices
64/100
average quality score
8%
strong evidence, of 50 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Canada

Drawn from: Inclusive Design Research Centre (OCAD University) — Open-Source Inclusive Design · Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care System ($10-a-Day Child Care) · Fable — Accessibility Testing and Co-Design with People with Disabilities · K-Net — First Nations-Owned Broadband and Telehealth Network · TRIEC Mentoring Partnership · TRIEC Mentoring Partnership — Toronto's Skilled-Immigrant Employment Bridge · Cyber-Seniors: Connecting Generations — Reverse-Mentoring Digital and Online-Safety Training · Digital Literacy Exchange Program (DLEP)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +27 pts 71 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +17 pts 71 here · 54 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +15 pts 91 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +14 pts 61 here · 48 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Curator validation +9 pts 83 here · 74 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +9 pts 68 here · 59 average

Weaknesses

Effectiveness -11 pts 67 here · 77 average

Equity & inclusion -13 pts 39 here · 52 average

Achievement / evidence -24 pts 67 here · 91 average

Efficiency -28 pts 17 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
71 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
71 · 54
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
91 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
61 · 48
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Curator validation
83 · 74
Evidence of impact / measured public value
68 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
56 · 50
Governance, capability & sustainability
69 · 64
Transferability / demonstrated replication
63 · 59
Impact on gender equality
83 · 80
Scalability beyond pilot
67 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
39 · 37
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
30 · 31
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
48 · 50
Sustainability (ongoing)
75 · 78
Innovation level
59 · 63
Inclusiveness / equity
37 · 42
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Effectiveness
67 · 77
Equity & inclusion
39 · 52
Achievement / evidence
67 · 91
Efficiency
17 · 44

Coloured bar: Canada. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Inclusive Design Research Centre (OCAD University) — Open-Source Inclusive Design · 100

Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care System ($10-a-Day Child Care) · 96

Fable — Accessibility Testing and Co-Design with People with Disabilities · 96

K-Net — First Nations-Owned Broadband and Telehealth Network · 96

TRIEC Mentoring Partnership · 91

TRIEC Mentoring Partnership — Toronto's Skilled-Immigrant Employment Bridge · 91

Caring Dads — Canada's Child-Protection-Linked Programme for Fathers Who Have Used Violence · 89

Cyber-Seniors: Connecting Generations — Reverse-Mentoring Digital and Online-Safety Training · 88

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Canada concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more