What works in Oxford
All catalogues · United Kingdom profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Oxford
Oxford demonstrates substantial research commercialisation through Oxford University Innovation, its wholly owned tech-transfer company, which reported £31.1m income in 2023/24, returning £15.9m to the University and filing 93 new patents and 411 licences. The University has also become the first UK university to offer all staff and students free access to ChatGPT Edu (GPT-5) from 2025/26, following a year-long pilot with ~750 users and backed by governance and 100+ AI Ambassadors, though outcomes evidence remains descriptive rather than independently validated. However, an AI chatbot wellbeing app co-developed by Oxford Brookes University found no significant benefit in two well-powered UK randomised controlled trials (N=177 and N=240), with average engagement of only two app interactions per student, illustrating risks of AI tools failing to improve outcomes despite sound design.
Drawn from: Oxford University Innovation — University-Owned Technology Transfer Office with £31.1m Annual Income · Oxford's University-Wide ChatGPT Edu Rollout — Free GPT-5 Access for All Staff and Students After a 750-Person Pilot · Mind Tutor — A Well-Powered UK RCT Finds No Wellbeing Benefit from an AI Chatbot App
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average
Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average
Weaknesses
Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average
Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average
Sustainability / continuity -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average
Innovation -29 pts 33 here · 62 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Oxford. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Oxford University Innovation — University-Owned Technology Transfer Office with £31.1m Annual Income · 57
Mind Tutor — A Well-Powered UK RCT Finds No Wellbeing Benefit from an AI Chatbot App · 27
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more