evidoria

What works in Quito

All catalogues · Ecuador profile

20
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
6%
strong evidence, of 17 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Quito

Quito has implemented several participatory and safety initiatives addressing urban planning and public transport security. GeoCitizen's participatory-GIS land-zoning process engaged 5 neighbourhoods, 7 communities and 3 parishes in developing a legally submitted land-use plan for Ilaló Mountain in 2013, alongside 15 hectares of reforestation. Bájale al Acoso's free SMS harassment reporting system, launched in March 2017, has received over 2,700 reports from public transport riders, resulting in 43 cases referred to prosecutors and 10 convictions. These practices demonstrate Quito's efforts in citizen participation and transit safety, though the evidence does not quantify broader city-wide impacts or longer-term outcomes beyond the documented convictions.

Drawn from: Ecuador's 'Paridad y Alternancia' Electoral Reform — Mandatory 50/50 Alternating Gender Parity in All Candidate Lists (2020) · Banco Pichincha's Co-Designed Accessible Mobile Banking — Blind Customers Guiding App Development in Ecuador · Red de Infocentros Comunitarios – Ecuador's National Rural Community Digital Network · GeoCitizen — Participatory GIS Land-Use Planning for Quito's Ilaló Mountain · Bájale al Acoso — Free SMS Harassment Reporting on Quito's Public Transport · AEI — Ecuador's Public-Private-Academic Alliance for Entrepreneurship and Innovation · Ecuador's WCAG 2.0 AA Web-Accessibility Mandate — a Binding Law With Near-Zero Measured Compliance · SCE's AI Code of Ethics and AI Lab — Ecuador's First Public-Sector AI Governance Framework

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Evidence of learning impact +24 pts 50 here · 26 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +15 pts 93 here · 78 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +15 pts 89 here · 74 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Transferability / replicability +10 pts 70 here · 60 average

Weaknesses

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -14 pts 43 here · 57 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Documented learning
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evidence of learning impact
50 · 26
Sustainability (ongoing)
93 · 78
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 74
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
58 · 48
Transferability / replicability
70 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 28
Transparency, fairness & accountability
58 · 54
Impact on gender equality
75 · 71
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
8 · 6
Scalability beyond pilot
63 · 62
Innovation level
60 · 62
Evaluated outcomes
75 · 79
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
42 · 48
Efficiency
25 · 33
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Evidence of impact / measured public value
43 · 57
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Curator validation
50 · 73
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37

Coloured bar: Quito. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Ecuador's 'Paridad y Alternancia' Electoral Reform — Mandatory 50/50 Alternating Gender Parity in All Candidate Lists (2020) · 96

Banco Pichincha's Co-Designed Accessible Mobile Banking — Blind Customers Guiding App Development in Ecuador · 92

Red de Infocentros Comunitarios – Ecuador's National Rural Community Digital Network · 92

GeoCitizen — Participatory GIS Land-Use Planning for Quito's Ilaló Mountain · 86

Bájale al Acoso — Free SMS Harassment Reporting on Quito's Public Transport · 78

AEI — Ecuador's Public-Private-Academic Alliance for Entrepreneurship and Innovation · 71

Ecuador's WCAG 2.0 AA Web-Accessibility Mandate — a Binding Law With Near-Zero Measured Compliance · 68

SCE's AI Code of Ethics and AI Lab — Ecuador's First Public-Sector AI Governance Framework · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more