evidoria

What works in Quito

All catalogues · Ecuador profile

8
evaluated practices
71/100
average quality score
12%
strong evidence, of 8 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Evidence of learning impact +70 pts 100 here · 30 average

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +32 pts 83 here · 51 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +15 pts 50 here · 35 average

Governance, certification & transferability +14 pts 80 here · 66 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Scalability beyond pilot +9 pts 75 here · 66 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +8 pts 17 here · 9 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of impact / measured public value -16 pts 44 here · 60 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -39 pts 0 here · 39 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Evidence of learning impact
100 · 30
Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Efficiency
100 · 52
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
83 · 51
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 80
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
50 · 35
Governance, certification & transferability
80 · 66
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 53
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Scalability beyond pilot
75 · 66
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
17 · 9
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Innovation level
60 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured public value
44 · 60
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 39

Coloured bar: Quito. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Ecuador's 'Paridad y Alternancia' Electoral Reform — Mandatory 50/50 Alternating Gender Parity in All Candidate Lists (2020) · 96

Red de Infocentros Comunitarios – Ecuador's National Rural Community Digital Network · 92

SCE's AI Code of Ethics and AI Lab — Ecuador's First Public-Sector AI Governance Framework · 67

SEDIP — Ecuador's Innovatrics ABIS Unifying Passport, Cédula and Social-Service Access · 67

SENESCYT–World Bank ALEKS Math-Remediation RCT — National Digital Personalized Learning for Ecuador's First-Year College Students · 67

Ecuador SRI — Sistema Falcon: AI-Powered Tax Risk Scoring · 60

FONAG — Quito Water Protection Fund (Ecuador) · 60

Ecuador Socio Bosque Conservation Programme · 60

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

VIGINUM's D3lta — France's Open-Source AI Tool for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more