evidoria

What works in Redmond

All catalogues · United States of America profile

5
evaluated practices
82/100
average quality score
25%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evidence of learning impact +40 pts 67 here · 26 average

Scalability & sustainability +38 pts 100 here · 62 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 38 average

Evaluation evidence +26 pts 75 here · 49 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Innovation level +8 pts 70 here · 62 average

Weaknesses

No standout gaps.

Score profile vs peers

Evidence of learning impact
67 · 26
Scalability & sustainability
100 · 62
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 38
Evaluation evidence
75 · 49
Documented learning
100 · 74
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 78
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Innovation level
70 · 62
Demonstrated reach
75 · 76

Coloured bar: Redmond. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Seeing AI — Microsoft's Real-Time AI Visual Assistant for Blind and Low-Vision Users · 96

Xbox Adaptive Controller — Co-Designing a Modular Gaming Controller with Disability Nonprofits · 96

Microsoft Immersive Reader — Free AI Reading Support Built on Dyslexia Research · 92

Microsoft Reading Coach & Reading Progress · 73

Inclusive: A Microsoft Design Toolkit — The Persona Spectrum and 'Solve for One, Extend to Many' · 52

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more