evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Inclusive: A Microsoft Design Toolkit — The Persona Spectrum and 'Solve for One, Extend to Many'

United States of America · Redmond · See the United States of America profile · See the Redmond profile

Top 82% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Microsoft's open Inclusive Design toolkit teaches designers to treat permanent, temporary and situational limitations as one spectrum. Widely cited, but no published outcome evaluation.

Inclusive: A Microsoft Design Toolkit — The Persona Spectrum and 'Solve for One, Extend to Many'

Details

Promoter
Microsoft Design
Period
2016–
Keywords
inclusive design, toolkit, persona spectrum, design practice

Description

Inclusive: A Microsoft Design Toolkit, developed under Kat Holmes (Microsoft's principal director of inclusive design 2014–2017), packages inclusive design as three principles: recognise exclusion, learn from diversity, and solve for one, extend to many. Its Persona Spectrum tool expands a conventional persona across permanent, temporary and situational limitations; Microsoft's own example is upper-limb loss versus a temporary injury or a parent holding a baby.
The materials, including Inclusive 101 and activity cards, are published free online. Microsoft positions them to complement, not replace, existing design processes, and names three benefits: increased access, reduced friction and richer emotional context. Holmes later expanded the ideas in the MIT Press book Mismatch: How Inclusion Shapes Design.
Caveats: the sources describe the method and its intent but publish no controlled evaluation or product-level outcome data, and the quoted prevalence figures are US estimates from the vendor. It is best read as a widely used practice framework rather than a proven intervention.

Read the full analysis: https://inclusive.microsoft.design/articles/inclusive-101-guidebook

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful