evidoria

What works in Rome

All catalogues · Italy profile

11
evaluated practices
65/100
average quality score
9%
strong evidence, of 11 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Transparency, ethics & data protection +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Sustainability +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Documented learning -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Demonstrated reach -75 pts 0 here · 75 average

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, ethics & data protection
100 · 50
Efficiency
100 · 52
Curator validation
100 · 75
Sustainability
100 · 80
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Governance, capability & sustainability
73 · 66
Scalability beyond pilot
71 · 66
Evidence of impact / measured public value
60 · 60
Equity & inclusion
50 · 54
Innovation level
60 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 39
Documented learning
50 · 73
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 30
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Demonstrated reach
0 · 75

Coloured bar: Rome. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Gender Equality Certification (Certificazione per la parità di genere) · 96

Osservatorio nazionale per l’integrazione delle politiche per la parità di genere - National Observatory for the Integration of Gender Policies · 96

ANAC's Corruption Risk Indicators Portal — Italy's Algorithmic Red-Flag System for Public Procurement · 80

VeRa — Italy's AI risk-scoring algorithm for tax-evasion detection · 80

INPS's AI-Rewritten Plain-Language Content — Italy's Social Security Institute Matches Expert Writers in a 1,600-User Blind Test · 73

Similis — The Italian Senate's AI Tool for Clustering Near-Duplicate Legislative Amendments · 67

Italy's National AI-in-Schools Guidelines — From a 15-School Pilot to Ministerial Decree No. 166 · 53

NetforNEET · 52

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more