evidoria

What works in Rome

All catalogues · Italy profile

19
evaluated practices
65/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 15 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Rome

Based on the evidence in the CONTEXT, Rome's prosecutors reported handling around 25 new gender-based violence cases per day in the weeks following Italy's Codice Rosso law (Law 69/2019), which required prosecutors to interview alleged victims of domestic and gender-based violence within three days of a police report. This represented a significant case surge that strained prosecutors' offices across Italy. However, the practices in the CONTEXT provide no other quantified data or evidence specific to Rome.

Drawn from: Gender Equality Certification (Certificazione per la parità di genere) · Osservatorio nazionale per l’integrazione delle politiche per la parità di genere - National Observatory for the Integration of Gender Policies · AgID × CNR-ISTI MAUVE++ — Checking Italy's Self-Declared Accessibility Against a National Automated Crawl · Italy's Legge Golfo-Mosca — Corporate Board Gender Quota Law (2011) · Codice Rosso (Law 69/2019) — Italy's Three-Day Fast-Track Prosecution for Gender-Based Violence · ANAC's Corruption Risk Indicators Portal — Italy's Algorithmic Red-Flag System for Public Procurement · VeRa — Italy's AI risk-scoring algorithm for tax-evasion detection · INPS's AI-Rewritten Plain-Language Content — Italy's Social Security Institute Matches Expert Writers in a 1,600-User Blind Test

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Transparency, ethics & data protection +53 pts 100 here · 47 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Effectiveness +12 pts 80 here · 68 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Scalability beyond pilot +12 pts 74 here · 62 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Transferability / replicability +10 pts 69 here · 60 average

Impact on gender equality +9 pts 80 here · 71 average

Weaknesses

Evaluation evidence -9 pts 40 here · 49 average

Documented learning -14 pts 60 here · 74 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Demonstrated reach -36 pts 40 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, ethics & data protection
100 · 47
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Effectiveness
80 · 68
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Scalability beyond pilot
74 · 62
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Transferability / replicability
69 · 60
Impact on gender equality
80 · 71
Efficiency
40 · 33
Curator validation
80 · 73
Evidence of impact / measured public value
62 · 57
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Sustainability
80 · 78
Evaluated outcomes
80 · 79
Equity & inclusion
50 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Innovation level
56 · 62
Evaluation evidence
40 · 49
Documented learning
60 · 74
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Demonstrated reach
40 · 76

Coloured bar: Rome. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Gender Equality Certification (Certificazione per la parità di genere) · 96

Osservatorio nazionale per l’integrazione delle politiche per la parità di genere - National Observatory for the Integration of Gender Policies · 96

AgID × CNR-ISTI MAUVE++ — Checking Italy's Self-Declared Accessibility Against a National Automated Crawl · 96

Italy's Legge Golfo-Mosca — Corporate Board Gender Quota Law (2011) · 89

Codice Rosso (Law 69/2019) — Italy's Three-Day Fast-Track Prosecution for Gender-Based Violence · 85

ANAC's Corruption Risk Indicators Portal — Italy's Algorithmic Red-Flag System for Public Procurement · 80

VeRa — Italy's AI risk-scoring algorithm for tax-evasion detection · 80

Italy's Consiglio di Stato on Algorithmic Teacher Assignment — Knowability, Human Oversight and Non-Discrimination as Binding Rules · 73

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Read Along (Bolo) — Google's AI reading tutor for low-literacy children in India · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more