evidoria

What works in Italy

All catalogues

98
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
8%
strong evidence, of 88 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Italy

Italy has implemented several institutional measures to advance gender equality in employment and leadership. Gender equality guidelines for public administration provide orientations to avoid discriminatory practices in senior recruitment, while Law 162/2021 establishes a Gender Equality Certification for employers adopting concrete measures to reduce gender gaps in career development, pay equity and maternity protection. At the systemic level, Italy established a National Observatory for the Integration of Gender Policies to institutionalise government adoption and monitoring of a national gender equality strategy. Additionally, Italy's public administrations are subject to automated accessibility audits, revealing significant gaps: only ~1% of 780,152 PDFs audited were correctly structured for accessibility despite public bodies self-declaring 43% conformance.

Drawn from: Gender equality in the organisation and management of the employment contract with Public Administration · Gender Equality Certification (Certificazione per la parità di genere) · Osservatorio nazionale per l’integrazione delle politiche per la parità di genere - National Observatory for the Integration of Gender Policies · Empowerment delle Donne con l’Industria 4.0 · AgID × CNR-ISTI MAUVE++ — Checking Italy's Self-Declared Accessibility Against a National Automated Crawl · Donne al Quadrato · Hub di Quartiere — Milan's Neighbourhood Food Waste Recovery Network · Women on Board

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +31 pts 62 here · 32 average

Effectiveness +28 pts 94 here · 66 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +24 pts 71 here · 47 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +16 pts 70 here · 54 average

Impact on gender equality +12 pts 82 here · 70 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +12 pts 76 here · 64 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +10 pts 48 here · 38 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 96 here · 87 average

Inclusiveness / equity +9 pts 52 here · 43 average

Innovation level +9 pts 70 here · 62 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +8 pts 82 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Documented learning -10 pts 64 here · 74 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -10 pts 17 here · 27 average

Curator validation -11 pts 62 here · 73 average

Equity & inclusion -11 pts 38 here · 50 average

Evaluation evidence -35 pts 14 here · 49 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
62 · 32
Effectiveness
94 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
71 · 47
Transparency, fairness & accountability
70 · 54
Impact on gender equality
82 · 70
Governance, capability & sustainability
76 · 64
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
58 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
48 · 38
Achievement / evidence
96 · 87
Inclusiveness / equity
52 · 43
Innovation level
70 · 62
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
82 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
86 · 78
Sustainability
85 · 78
Scalability
69 · 62
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
92 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured results
60 · 57
Evidence of learning impact
29 · 26
Transferability / replicability
62 · 60
Demonstrated reach
71 · 76
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
42 · 48
Documented learning
64 · 74
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 27
Curator validation
62 · 73
Equity & inclusion
38 · 50
Evaluation evidence
14 · 49

Coloured bar: Italy. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Gender equality in the organisation and management of the employment contract with Public Administration · 96

Gender Equality Certification (Certificazione per la parità di genere) · 96

Osservatorio nazionale per l’integrazione delle politiche per la parità di genere - National Observatory for the Integration of Gender Policies · 96

Empowerment delle Donne con l’Industria 4.0 · 96

AgID × CNR-ISTI MAUVE++ — Checking Italy's Self-Declared Accessibility Against a National Automated Crawl · 96

Donne al Quadrato · 93

Hub di Quartiere — Milan's Neighbourhood Food Waste Recovery Network · 91

Women on Board · 89

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Italy concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more