evidoria

What works in Santiago

All catalogues · Chile profile

21
evaluated practices
68/100
average quality score
14%
strong evidence, of 21 assessed
2
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Scalability beyond pilot +20 pts 86 here · 66 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +13 pts 93 here · 80 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Inclusiveness / equity +12 pts 53 here · 41 average

Governance, certification & transferability +12 pts 78 here · 66 average

Evidence of learning impact +10 pts 40 here · 30 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +10 pts 70 here · 60 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Innovation level +9 pts 73 here · 64 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +8 pts 17 here · 9 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -18 pts 17 here · 35 average

Curator validation -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Efficiency -27 pts 25 here · 52 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Scalability beyond pilot
86 · 66
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Sustainability (ongoing)
93 · 80
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
53 · 41
Governance, certification & transferability
78 · 66
Evidence of learning impact
40 · 30
Evidence of impact / measured public value
70 · 60
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Innovation level
73 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
17 · 9
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Transferability / demonstrated replication
64 · 59
Transparency, ethics & data protection
53 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
40 · 39
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 53
Effectiveness
75 · 81
Impact on gender equality
75 · 83
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 35
Curator validation
50 · 75
Efficiency
25 · 52

Coloured bar: Santiago. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Chile's Gender Parity Law 21.216 — World's First Gender-Balanced Constitutional Body (2021) · 96

BiblioRedes – National Public Library Digital Inclusion Network · 88

Start-Up Chile — CORFO's Global Talent-Attraction Accelerator · 86

Startup Chile — Government Startup Accelerator (CORFO) · 86

Chile's Ley Karin — Mandatory Workplace Harassment & Violence Prevention Law · 85

Start-Up Chile — Government Accelerator Attracting Global Entrepreneurs to Santiago · 81

SERNAC's Real-Time Consumer Protection Alert System — Chile Cuts Market-Crisis Detection From Weeks to Under 24 Hours · 80

Chile's Mesa Mujer y Minería: Raising Women's Share of the Mining Workforce from 7.7% to 24% · 74

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more