What works in Seoul
All catalogues · South Korea profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluation evidence +37 pts 86 here · 49 average
Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average
Innovation level +12 pts 74 here · 62 average
Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average
Documented learning +11 pts 86 here · 74 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average
Sustainability (ongoing) +10 pts 88 here · 78 average
Weaknesses
Effectiveness -10 pts 57 here · 68 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average
Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -22 pts 6 here · 28 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -29 pts 8 here · 37 average
Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Seoul. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
SK Telecom's AI Care — Voice-Activated Emergency Monitoring for Seniors Living Alone · 96
Nationwide Accessible Kiosk Mandate · 92
Digital Baeumteo – National Digital Competence Training Network · 92
South Korea's Public-Sector Gender Employment Disclosure System · 85
South Korea's Capital Markets Act Amendment — A Sanction-Free Mandate for One Female Director · 82
Seoul Open Data Plaza — Scaling Public Data Into a High-Use Civic Utility · 81
Seoul Innovation Park — Urban Social Innovation Testbed · 81
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more