evidoria

What works in Seoul

All catalogues · South Korea profile

21
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 21 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Seoul

Seoul has emerged as a major hub for social innovation and startup growth. The Seoul Innovation Park hosts 235 organisations and 1,200+ innovators working across energy, food, education, housing and civic tech, while the Seoul Municipal Startup Fund Programme raised 3.4 trillion won (283% above target) between 2019–22, invested in 470 startups, and created 8,200+ jobs. These initiatives reflect Seoul's strategic repositioning as a social and civic innovation hub, though the evidence does not quantify their broader economic or social impact beyond job creation and capital raised.

Drawn from: Digital Baeumteo – National Digital Competence Training Network · Seoul Innovation Park — Urban Social Innovation Testbed · Seoul's Municipal Startup Fund Programme — Future Innovation Growth Fund & Vision 2030 · South Korea's Public Sector Gender Representation Enhancement Plan (3rd Plan, 2023–2027) · Citizen Lottery Jury — South Korea's Public Evaluation Panel for Selecting Its Sovereign AI Foundation Models · ICONLOOP's Blockchain Mobile Driver's License — Testing Decentralized ID Under Korea's ICT Regulatory Sandbox · Clova CareCall — South Korea's AI phone service for isolated elderly citizens · South Korea's Post-"Nth Room" Digital Sex Crime Reforms & Victim Support Center

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +32 pts 83 here · 51 average

Inclusiveness / equity +26 pts 67 here · 41 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Innovation level +17 pts 82 here · 64 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +14 pts 94 here · 80 average

Evaluation evidence +14 pts 50 here · 36 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -11 pts 42 here · 53 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Documented learning -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Curator validation -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -31 pts 8 here · 39 average

Effectiveness -31 pts 50 here · 81 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -35 pts 0 here · 35 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
83 · 51
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 41
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Innovation level
82 · 64
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Sustainability (ongoing)
94 · 80
Evaluation evidence
50 · 36
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 78
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Transparency, fairness & accountability
57 · 54
Governance, capability & sustainability
70 · 66
Scalability beyond pilot
69 · 66
Evidence of impact / measured public value
56 · 60
Transferability / demonstrated replication
52 · 59
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
42 · 53
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Documented learning
50 · 73
Curator validation
50 · 75
Teacher capability & pedagogy
8 · 39
Effectiveness
50 · 81
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 35
Efficiency
0 · 52

Coloured bar: Seoul. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Digital Baeumteo – National Digital Competence Training Network · 92

Seoul Innovation Park — Urban Social Innovation Testbed · 81

Seoul's Municipal Startup Fund Programme — Future Innovation Growth Fund & Vision 2030 · 76

South Korea's Public Sector Gender Representation Enhancement Plan (3rd Plan, 2023–2027) · 74

Citizen Lottery Jury — South Korea's Public Evaluation Panel for Selecting Its Sovereign AI Foundation Models · 73

ICONLOOP's Blockchain Mobile Driver's License — Testing Decentralized ID Under Korea's ICT Regulatory Sandbox · 73

Clova CareCall — South Korea's AI phone service for isolated elderly citizens · 73

South Korea's Post-"Nth Room" Digital Sex Crime Reforms & Victim Support Center · 70

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more