evidoria

What works in Seville

All catalogues · Spain profile

3
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Seville

Seville's Segregated Cycle Network shows that rapid expansion of a connected, traffic-segregated cycling network can substantially shift travel behaviour: the city grew its network from 12 km to 120–164 km between 2006 and 2011 at a cost of roughly €0.27 million per km, and cycling rose from 0.5% of trips in 2006 to about 6% by 2014, with daily cycling trips reaching roughly 70,000. The city also launched a public bike-share system in 2007 and reported annual CO2 savings of about 8,000 tonnes. However, the evidence is largely descriptive and survey-based rather than from a controlled evaluation, and COVID-19 disrupted use in later years.

Drawn from: Seville's Segregated Cycle Network — From 0.5% to About 6% of Trips in Under a Decade · RAPCA — Andalusia's Grazed Fuel-Break Network for Wildfire Prevention · Programa G+ and Gender Budget Audits (Andalusia, Spain)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +94 pts 100 here · 6 average

Governance, certification & transferability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Sustainability +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -41 pts 33 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average

Curator validation -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Score profile vs peers

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
100 · 6
Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 64
Sustainability
100 · 78
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 57
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Innovation
67 · 62
Scalability
67 · 62
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 28
Efficiency
0 · 33
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
33 · 74
Effectiveness
0 · 68
Impact on gender equality
0 · 71
Curator validation
0 · 73

Coloured bar: Seville. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Seville's Segregated Cycle Network — From 0.5% to About 6% of Trips in Under a Decade · 62

RAPCA — Andalusia's Grazed Fuel-Break Network for Wildfire Prevention · 53

Programa G+ and Gender Budget Audits (Andalusia, Spain) · 52

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more