evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Programa G+ and Gender Budget Audits (Andalusia, Spain)

Spain · Seville · See the Spain profile · See the Seville profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 68% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Andalusia rates every budget programme for gender relevance (G+) and has audited it since 2013, covering EUR 16.6bn of spending by 2017 — though auditors found gender integration into programme design still insufficient.

24 programmes
Spending programmes audited by 2017 (by 2017)
7 agencies
Public agencies audited by 2017 (by 2017)
16.6 EUR billion
Value of audited spending by 2017 (by 2017)
~70%
Share of G+/G-rated 2018 budget programmes covered by audit (2018 budget)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Junta de Andalucía — Consejería de Hacienda y Administración Pública; Cámara de Cuentas de Andalucía
Period
2003–present (audits since 2013)
Region (NUTS)
ES61
Keywords
public sector, budgeting, fiscal policy, gender equality, public administration

Context

Since the early 2000s, Andalusia has rated every regional budget programme for its relevance to gender equality (G+ for the highest-relevance programmes) and published an annual gender impact assessment report since 2006. From 2013, the region's independent Chamber of Accounts (Cámara de Cuentas) began auditing this using a '3R + Results' method (representation, resources, reality and results).

Results

By 2017 these audits had covered 24 spending programmes and 7 public agencies worth around EUR 16.6 billion, roughly 70% of the programmes rated G+ or G in the 2018 budget. The Audit Office's own analysis found the model had survived years of austerity thanks to committed leadership and a strong network of equality organisations, but concluded that integration of a gender perspective into programme design remained insufficient, that many equality-focused programmes' impact had often not been assessed, and that objectives were too generic, calling for more specific, comparable indicators.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Junta de Andalucía Consejería de Hacienda y Administración Pública staff producing annual gender impact assessment reports, Cámara de Cuentas de Andalucía (independent regional audit body) auditors applying the 3R + Results method

Conditions for success

  • Committed political and administrative leadership sustained across years of budget austerity
  • A strong external network of equality organisations supporting the process

Common failure modes

  • Gender-perspective integration into programme design was found insufficient by the Audit Office's own analysis
  • The impact of many equality-focused programmes had often not been assessed
  • Programme objectives were judged too generic, lacking specific, comparable indicators

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes CERV — Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful