What works in Sheffield
All catalogues · United Kingdom profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Sheffield
Sheffield has undertaken two significant urban regeneration initiatives demonstrating creative and environmental approaches to city renewal. Sheffield's Cultural Industries Quarter grew from ~120 cultural businesses and 1,200 jobs in the 1990s to over 2,000 businesses and 9,000 jobs generating almost £1bn annually, diversifying the city's economy after industrial decline. Grey to Green converted a redundant dual carriageway into the UK's largest retrofit sustainable drainage scheme (2014–2022), achieving up to 80% peak flow-rate reduction in storms, diverting ~24,000 bathtubs of water annually from sewers, and increasing measured biodiversity value by nearly 500–561%. Together, these practices show Sheffield's shift from heavy industrial dependency toward creative-sector clustering and climate-adaptive infrastructure, though the evidence does not quantify other dimensions of quality of life or broader social outcomes.
Drawn from: Future Digital Inclusion · Reboot UK · English My Way · Sheffield's Cultural Industries Quarter — Four Decades of Creative-Sector Urban Regeneration · Grey to Green — Sheffield's Retrofit SuDS Scheme Turning a Dual Carriageway into Rain Gardens (UK) · HMCTS - Face-to-face Assisted Digital Support · The Digital Garage · HMRC Work IT Out
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average
Weaknesses
Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average
Governance, certification & transferability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average
Sustainability (ongoing) -18 pts 60 here · 78 average
Demonstrated reach -20 pts 56 here · 76 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication -27 pts 33 here · 60 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average
Documented learning -30 pts 44 here · 74 average
Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Sheffield. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Reboot UK · 72
English My Way · 72
Sheffield's Cultural Industries Quarter — Four Decades of Creative-Sector Urban Regeneration · 62
Grey to Green — Sheffield's Retrofit SuDS Scheme Turning a Dual Carriageway into Rain Gardens (UK) · 53
HMCTS - Face-to-face Assisted Digital Support · 52
The Digital Garage · 32
HMRC Work IT Out · 32
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more