evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Grey to Green — Sheffield's Retrofit SuDS Scheme Turning a Dual Carriageway into Rain Gardens (UK)

United Kingdom · Sheffield · See the United Kingdom profile · See the Sheffield profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Sheffield turned a redundant dual carriageway into the UK's largest retrofit SuDS scheme (2014-2022): swales cut peak flow up to 80% in storms, divert ~24,000 bathtubs of water yearly from sewers, and roughly quintupled measured biodiversity value.

up to 80%
Peak flow-rate reduction in high-intensity storms
~24,000 bathtubs' worth
Stormwater diverted from sewers annually
reported as 'nearly 500%' and '561%'
Before/after biodiversity value increase
~£9.9 million
Combined programme cost (Phases 1 and 2) (2014-2022)
Grey to Green — Sheffield's Retrofit SuDS Scheme Turning a Dual Carriageway into Rain Gardens (UK)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Sheffield City Council, with Green Estate Ltd and the University of Sheffield (design lead: Prof. Nigel Dunnett); funded by the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority, European Regional Development Fund, Sheffield City Council, Canal & River Trust and Yorkshire Water
Period
2014-2022
Region (NUTS)
UKE3
Keywords
sustainable drainage (SuDS), urban greening, flood risk management, biodiversity

Context

A redundant dual-carriageway through Sheffield's Riverside Business District, made obsolete by a new outer ring road, was redesigned as a sustainable drainage (SuDS) and green-street retrofit rather than rebuilt for traffic.

Objectives

Sheffield City Council, with social enterprise Green Estate Ltd and the University of Sheffield (Prof. Nigel Dunnett), set out to manage stormwater and green the corridor rather than restore it to a road.

Activities

Phase 1 (approved 2014, completed 2016, ~£3.6m, funded with the Canal & River Trust and ERDF) and Phase 2 (approved 2019, largely completed 2020, finished 2022, ~£6.3m, adding Yorkshire Water) together created around 56 swale and rain-garden beds, 40 semi-mature trees and 25 check dams along roughly a kilometre of former highway, plus 1.3 km of new pedestrian and cycling routes.

Results

Monitoring cited by the Connected by Water partnership and UK100 reports up to 80% peak flow-rate reduction in intense storms, about 24,000 bathtubs of water diverted from sewers annually, and a before/after biodiversity-value increase reported as 'nearly 500%' and '561%' by the two partners; reduced local ambient temperature is also reported without a specific figure.

Conclusions

The scheme shows strong stormwater and biodiversity gains, but reported figures (corridor length, biodiversity uplift %) vary between promotional partners and no independent peer-reviewed evaluation or water-quality data exists, so results should be read as indicative programme-level claims.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Phase 1 (2014-2016) ~£3.6m; Phase 2 (2019-2022) ~£6.3m; combined ~£9.9m.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — 8-year phased delivery: Phase 1 approved 2014 and completed 2016; Phase 2 approved 2019, largely complete 2020, finished with a final element in spring 2022.
Staffing & skills
Sheffield City Council (delivery lead), Green Estate Ltd (social enterprise, design/build), University of Sheffield — Prof. Nigel Dunnett (planting design), Funders: South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority, ERDF, Canal & River Trust, Yorkshire Water

Conditions for success

  • A multi-funder coalition able to cover an estimated £9.9m combined cost across two phases
  • A redundant road corridor freed up by a new outer ring road
  • An ongoing maintenance partner (Green Estate Ltd) to sustain the planting

Where it fits

Governance type
local authority-led public-private partnership
Scale
city (roughly 1 km urban corridor)
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

ERDF — European Regional Development Fund National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful