evidoria

What works in Skopje

All catalogues · North Macedonia profile

16
evaluated practices
43/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 14 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Skopje

The evidence in the CONTEXT block does not contain practices focused on Skopje specifically. The practices address North Macedonia as a country—its national health booking system, parliamentary gender quotas, pensioner media-literacy training, and government-wide gender-responsive budgeting—but none isolate or report findings specific to Skopje as a city or municipality.

NO_EVIDENCE

Drawn from: Moj Termin — North Macedonia's Digital Health Booking System and Its Unaddressed Accessibility Gap for Elderly Women · North Macedonia's 40% Candidate Quota — A Legal Target Meeting a Declining Outcome (2015-2025) · Use Facts: Disinformation-Resilience Training for Pensioners · Gender-Responsive Budgeting — North Macedonia's Decade-Long Institutionalisation Across Government · FITD — North Macedonia's Government Innovation Fund Turning Grants into VC-Backed Startups · FITR — North Macedonia's Fund for Innovation and Technological Development · Otvoreni Podatoci — North Macedonia's National Open Data Portal · Vezilka — North Macedonia's EU-Funded National AI Factory Antenna for Public Administration

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average

Transferability / replicability -12 pts 48 here · 60 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Scalability beyond pilot -19 pts 43 here · 62 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -19 pts 38 here · 57 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Impact on gender equality -21 pts 50 here · 71 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Equity & inclusion -28 pts 22 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes -29 pts 50 here · 79 average

Innovation level -30 pts 32 here · 62 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -32 pts 17 here · 48 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 28
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Sustainability (ongoing)
71 · 78
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Transferability / replicability
48 · 60
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Scalability beyond pilot
43 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured public value
38 · 57
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Impact on gender equality
50 · 71
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Equity & inclusion
22 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 79
Innovation level
32 · 62
Governance, capability & sustainability
33 · 64
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
17 · 48
Efficiency
0 · 33
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 48

Coloured bar: Skopje. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Moj Termin — North Macedonia's Digital Health Booking System and Its Unaddressed Accessibility Gap for Elderly Women · 84

North Macedonia's 40% Candidate Quota — A Legal Target Meeting a Declining Outcome (2015-2025) · 78

Use Facts: Disinformation-Resilience Training for Pensioners · 68

Gender-Responsive Budgeting — North Macedonia's Decade-Long Institutionalisation Across Government · 63

FITD — North Macedonia's Government Innovation Fund Turning Grants into VC-Backed Startups · 57

FITR — North Macedonia's Fund for Innovation and Technological Development · 57

Otvoreni Podatoci — North Macedonia's National Open Data Portal · 52

Vezilka — North Macedonia's EU-Funded National AI Factory Antenna for Public Administration · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more