evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

FITD — North Macedonia's Government Innovation Fund Turning Grants into VC-Backed Startups

North Macedonia · Skopje · See the North Macedonia profile · See the Skopje profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 74% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2013, North Macedonia's state Fund for Innovation and Technological Development has backed over 800 projects worth more than €100M. Grantee Pixyle.ai grew from 8 to 30 staff on an €80,000 grant before raising €1M in venture capital.

550–800+ companies/projects
Companies/projects supported (2013 to early 2020s)
100+ EUR million
Total value of support (2013 to early 2020s)
17.7 EUR million
World Bank co-financing (Skills Development and Innovation Support project) (2014–2021)
80,000 EUR
Pixyle.ai FITD start-up grant (2018–2019)
8 to 30 employees
Pixyle.ai staff growth (2018–2021)
1 EUR million
Pixyle.ai venture capital raised (post-grant)
2 EUR million
Native Teams venture capital raised (post-grant)
FITD — North Macedonia's Government Innovation Fund Turning Grants into VC-Backed Startups

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Fund for Innovation and Technological Development (FITD/FITR)
Period
2013–present
Keywords
innovation grants, SME technology adoption, venture capital, government fund

Context

Founded in 2013 as a government agency, North Macedonia's Fund for Innovation and Technological Development (FITD, known locally as FITR) offers a tiered menu of instruments: start-up and spin-off grants covering up to 85% of costs (capped near €30,000) for early R&D, and larger technological-extension grants covering up to 50% of costs (capped near €500,000) to help established SMEs adopt new technology, with roughly 40% of total project value co-invested by beneficiary companies.

Objectives

The fund aims to turn early-stage grants into investable, growth-stage technology companies, building North Macedonia's start-up and SME innovation ecosystem.

Activities

From 2014 to 2021 the World Bank backed the ecosystem through its €17.7 million Skills Development and Innovation Support project, financing four start-up and SME support instruments delivered through FITD. The fund helped enable three accelerators (Seavus, X factor and UKIM), and supported the launch of North Macedonia's first National Startup Council in 2021 alongside a National Corporate Innovation programme and National AI Strategy.

Results

By the early 2020s FITD had supported over 550 to 800+ companies and projects (figures vary by year and counting basis across sources) worth more than €100 million combined, roughly 70% of them start-ups. A named example tracked by the World Bank, computer-vision start-up Pixyle.ai, received about €80,000 in FITD start-up grants in 2018–2019, grew from 8 to 30 mostly local STEM employees, tripled its revenue over three years, and went on to raise €1 million from South Central Ventures — one of five North Macedonian start-ups that fund has backed at that scale, alongside a further €2 million raised by another FITD-linked firm, Native Teams, from Bulgaria's 11 Ventures.

Conclusions

No independent counterfactual evaluation of aggregate job creation was found in the sources reviewed: the figures come from World Bank reporting and a Swiss Entrepreneurship Program case study, and company-wide job and revenue outcomes beyond named examples like Pixyle.ai are not separately broken out.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Administered by the government agency FITD/FITR; delivery co-financed 2014–2021 by the World Bank via four support instruments

Conditions for success

  • A tiered instrument design (small early-stage grants plus larger technological-extension grants) matches support to firm maturity
  • Requiring roughly 40% co-investment from beneficiary companies filters for genuine commitment
  • Enabling three private accelerators (Seavus, X factor, UKIM) to extend delivery reach

Common failure modes

  • No independent counterfactual evaluation of aggregate job creation was found; no gender or regional breakdown of beneficiary companies was published

Where it fits

Governance type
national government fund, World Bank co-financed 2014–2021
Scale
national

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful