evidoria

What works in Stockholm

All catalogues · Sweden profile

22
evaluated practices
65/100
average quality score
14%
strong evidence, of 22 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +32 pts 67 here · 35 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Inclusiveness / equity +26 pts 67 here · 41 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Sustainability +17 pts 97 here · 80 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +16 pts 56 here · 39 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Evidence of learning impact +15 pts 44 here · 30 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Transferability / replicability +9 pts 69 here · 59 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -9 pts 44 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Scalability -10 pts 56 here · 66 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -25 pts 42 here · 66 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -53 pts 0 here · 53 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 52
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 35
Documented learning
100 · 73
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 41
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Sustainability
97 · 80
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 39
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Evidence of learning impact
44 · 30
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Transferability / replicability
69 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Curator validation
80 · 75
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
78 · 78
Innovation level
61 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
44 · 50
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Transparency, fairness & accountability
44 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured results
50 · 60
Scalability
56 · 66
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Governance, capability & sustainability
42 · 66
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 53

Coloured bar: Stockholm. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Sweden's Reserved 'Daddy Months' in Parental Insurance (Pappamånaden 1995–2016) · 100

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · 100

Sweden's Mandatory Annual Pay Equity Survey (Lönekartläggning) · 96

Empowering Female Entrepreneurship: The 'Women In Business" Magazine in Sweden · 94

Non-Profit Organization "Women in Tech" in Sweden · 93

Swedish Alliance for Women in Sport (SAFWIS) · 89

Women for leaders · 78

Stockholm Royal Seaport — fossil-free urban development testbed · 76

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Empowering Global Leadership: The Role of International Women's Forum Finland in Advancing Women's Leadership and Gender Equality · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more