evidoria

What works in Toronto

All catalogues · Canada profile

30
evaluated practices
58/100
average quality score
15%
strong evidence, of 20 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Toronto

Toronto has established itself as a hub for inclusive design and skilled-immigrant employment support. The Inclusive Design Research Centre at OCAD University operates with ~20 staff and has secured $2.9M in major grants (Hewlett Foundation and federal funding) to build inclusive technology and open education, while Fable raised $15.4M CAD total ($2M seed in 2020, $13.4M Series A in 2022) to scale disability-led accessibility testing with enterprise clients. TRIEC's Mentoring Partnership has logged 27,000+ mentoring matches since 2004, with participants 2.5x more likely to secure good-quality jobs and 85% of employed mentees in permanent, full-time roles—a model since replicated in six other Canadian cities and New Zealand. Together, these practices demonstrate Toronto's significant capacity in accessibility innovation, disability inclusion, and labour-market integration for skilled immigrants.

Drawn from: Inclusive Design Research Centre (OCAD University) — Open-Source Inclusive Design · Fable — Accessibility Testing and Co-Design with People with Disabilities · TRIEC Mentoring Partnership · TRIEC Mentoring Partnership — Toronto's Skilled-Immigrant Employment Bridge · Cyber-Seniors: Connecting Generations — Reverse-Mentoring Digital and Online-Safety Training · Ontario's Pay Equity Act (1987) — Mandatory Job-Comparison Pay Equity, With Gaps in Small and Non-Union Workplaces · MaRS Discovery District · Canada's University Salary Disclosure Laws — Public 'Sunshine' Lists and a 20–40% Narrower Faculty Gender Pay Gap

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +26 pts 75 here · 49 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +22 pts 75 here · 54 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +8 pts 82 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Evaluated outcomes -12 pts 67 here · 79 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Inclusiveness / equity -14 pts 28 here · 43 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Efficiency -16 pts 17 here · 33 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Sustainability / continuity -20 pts 58 here · 78 average

Impact on gender equality -38 pts 33 here · 71 average

Achievement / evidence -38 pts 50 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -56 pts 33 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 48
Evaluation evidence
75 · 49
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
75 · 54
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
82 · 74
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 28
Evidence of impact / measured results
63 · 57
Innovation
64 · 62
Transferability / demonstrated replication
58 · 60
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Curator validation
67 · 73
Scalability
56 · 62
Evaluated outcomes
67 · 79
Governance, capability & sustainability
50 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
28 · 43
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Efficiency
17 · 33
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Sustainability / continuity
58 · 78
Impact on gender equality
33 · 71
Achievement / evidence
50 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
33 · 89

Coloured bar: Toronto. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Inclusive Design Research Centre (OCAD University) — Open-Source Inclusive Design · 100

Fable — Accessibility Testing and Co-Design with People with Disabilities · 96

TRIEC Mentoring Partnership · 91

TRIEC Mentoring Partnership — Toronto's Skilled-Immigrant Employment Bridge · 91

Cyber-Seniors: Connecting Generations — Reverse-Mentoring Digital and Online-Safety Training · 88

Ontario's Pay Equity Act (1987) — Mandatory Job-Comparison Pay Equity, With Gaps in Small and Non-Union Workplaces · 78

MaRS Discovery District · 76

Canada's University Salary Disclosure Laws — Public 'Sunshine' Lists and a 20–40% Narrower Faculty Gender Pay Gap · 74

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more