evidoria

What works in Tórshavn

All catalogues · Faroe Islands profile

3
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -9 pts 53 here · 62 average

Transferability / replicability -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Sustainability -23 pts 56 here · 78 average

Scalability -29 pts 33 here · 62 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -41 pts 33 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 57
Innovation level
53 · 62
Transferability / replicability
50 · 60
Sustainability
56 · 78
Scalability
33 · 62
Efficiency
0 · 33
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
33 · 74
Effectiveness
0 · 68
Impact on gender equality
0 · 71

Coloured bar: Tórshavn. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

The Faroe Islands' Undersea-Cable Lifeline — High Internet Reach Alongside a Stalled Domestic Fibre Rollout · 68

Faroese Parental Leave Reform & the Gender Equality Commission · 63

Tunnels, Childcare and Trust: How the Faroe Islands Reversed a Decade of Youth Outmigration · 52

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more