evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

The Faroe Islands' Undersea-Cable Lifeline — High Internet Reach Alongside a Stalled Domestic Fibre Rollout

Faroe Islands · Tórshavn · See the Faroe Islands profile · See the Tórshavn profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 61% 68/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The Faroe Islands reach 97.6% internet penetration via undersea cables, yet by mid-2026 over a third of newly laid fibre-to-home connections sat inactive after state operator NET ran out of funding, forcing it to halt further rollout and pivot to wireless.

97.6 %
Internet penetration (early 2024)
34.6 per 100 people
Fixed broadband subscriptions (2022)
3+ Tbps
International cable capacity (FARICE-1/IRIS) (since 2023)
270 million DKK
Estimated spend on fibre-to-home rollout (2002-2026)
over one third of ~10,500 connections
Fibre-to-home connections physically laid but inactive (mid-2026)

Details

Promoter
Føroya Tele / NET, with Farice ehf.
Period
2002–2026 (international cables ongoing; domestic fibre rollout stalled 2026)
Keywords
telecommunications, digital infrastructure, submarine cables, rural/island connectivity

Context

The roughly 55,000 residents of the Faroe Islands, a remote North Atlantic archipelago, are connected internationally by two submarine cables: SHEFA-2 to Shetland/mainland Scotland (completed 2008) and FARICE-1 to Iceland and Scotland (2004), now carrying over 3 Tbps of traffic alongside sister cable IRIS since 2023.

Objectives

State-owned Føroya Tele, through subsidiary NET, set out to extend that international backbone into fibre-to-the-home connections for essentially the whole population.

Activities

Føroya Tele/NET spent an estimated 270 million Danish kroner installing fibre-to-the-home connections, with the cost per household rising from an original estimate of under 20,000 DKK to over 30,000 DKK.

Results

International connectivity delivered near-universal internet use: DataReportal recorded 97.6% of Faroese residents as internet users at the start of 2024, and World Bank data put fixed broadband subscriptions at 34.6 per 100 people in 2022. But by mid-2026, over a third of the roughly 10,500 connections Føroya Tele described as 'laid to customers' were physically cabled yet not activated. Facing funding shortfalls and political scrutiny, NET paused new fibre installation to focus on activating existing lines, offering wireless broadband to some households instead.

Conclusions

The case is a genuine mixed result: robust, redundant international connectivity produced near-universal internet use, but finishing the 'last mile' of a small, dispersed population's home fibre network ran into cost overruns and funding gaps even in a wealthy, well-connected territory — a caution against assuming backbone investment alone guarantees full domestic reach.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — An estimated 270 million DKK spent on fibre-to-the-home rollout as of 2026, with per-household costs having risen from under 20,000 DKK to over 30,000 DKK.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — International cables from 2002 (Farice ehf. era) through 2023 (IRIS); domestic fibre-to-home rollout ongoing since the early 2000s and stalled by mid-2026.
Staffing & skills
State-owned Føroya Tele and subsidiary NET operate the domestic network; international consortium partner Farice ehf. operates the FARICE-1/IRIS cable

Conditions for success

  • Redundant international submarine cable capacity to guarantee bandwidth
  • Sustained parent-company funding to complete last-mile connections, not just backbone links

Common failure modes

  • Per-household fibre cost rose well past original estimates (from under 20,000 DKK to over 30,000 DKK)
  • Parent-company funding did not keep pace with the rollout, leaving physically laid connections inactive and forcing a pause plus a pivot to wireless broadband for some households

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful