What works in Viena
All catalogues · Austria profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Viena
The evidence shows three distinct initiatives operating in Vienna. OCG Cares demonstrates a digital inclusion programme that began in 2015, with 22 refugees starting the first course cohort in early 2016 to gain IT skills and German-language proficiency through ECDL certification. The Women are TOP! project involved WU Vienna as one of two sub-project coordinators running from 2013 to 2015, contributing to a collection of 50+ good-practice measures for advancing women in leadership across Austrian companies. Additionally, an international IT company's Austrian branch operates a Diversity Council of Executives that institutionalises gender and diversity within its local business strategy, though the practices do not specify quantified outcomes or the current scope of these initiatives.
Drawn from: Diversity Council of executives · Women in leadership positions/The Women are Top! · OCG Cares
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Efficiency +67 pts 100 here · 33 average
Effectiveness +32 pts 100 here · 68 average
Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average
Sustainability (ongoing) +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average
Curator validation +19 pts 92 here · 73 average
Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average
Weaknesses
Transferability / replicability -27 pts 33 here · 60 average
Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average
Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Viena. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Diversity Council of executives · 70
Women in leadership positions/The Women are Top! · 58
OCG Cares · 32
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more