evidoria

What works in Austria

All catalogues

69
evaluated practices
54/100
average quality score
2%
strong evidence, of 54 assessed
3
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Austria

Drawn from: Austria's Violence Protection Act and Intervention Centres (Gewaltschutzgesetz 1997/2019) · Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · Cross Mentoring for Women Programme · FFG Monitoringstelle des Bundes — Austria's Multi-Year Digital Accessibility Monitoring with Disability-Led Testing · fit4internet – National Digital Competence Assessment and Upskilling Platform · Gebietsbetreuung Stadterneuerung — Vienna's Soft Urban Renewal Offices · Austria's Constitutional Gender Budgeting Mandate (Article 13(3) B-VG) · Vienna's Dual Social Housing Model — Municipal Gemeindebau plus Limited-Profit Housing at City Scale

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Inclusiveness / equity +21 pts 64 here · 43 average

Effectiveness +20 pts 86 here · 66 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Efficiency +14 pts 46 here · 32 average

Sustainability +12 pts 90 here · 78 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +9 pts 62 here · 54 average

Weaknesses

Curator validation -10 pts 63 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach -13 pts 62 here · 76 average

Achievement / evidence -15 pts 71 here · 87 average

Equity & inclusion -23 pts 27 here · 50 average

Evaluation evidence -24 pts 25 here · 49 average

Score profile vs peers

Inclusiveness / equity
64 · 43
Effectiveness
86 · 66
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Efficiency
46 · 32
Sustainability
90 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
62 · 54
Transparency, ethics & data protection
53 · 47
Evidence of impact / measured results
63 · 57
Governance, capability & sustainability
69 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
40 · 38
Documented learning
75 · 74
Scalability
61 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
47 · 48
Transferability / replicability
57 · 60
Innovation level
59 · 62
Impact on gender equality
67 · 70
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
70 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
73 · 78
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
82 · 89
Evidence of learning impact
20 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
20 · 27
Curator validation
63 · 73
Demonstrated reach
62 · 76
Achievement / evidence
71 · 87
Equity & inclusion
27 · 50
Evaluation evidence
25 · 49

Coloured bar: Austria. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Austria's Violence Protection Act and Intervention Centres (Gewaltschutzgesetz 1997/2019) · 100

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · 95

Cross Mentoring for Women Programme · 95

FFG Monitoringstelle des Bundes — Austria's Multi-Year Digital Accessibility Monitoring with Disability-Led Testing · 92

fit4internet – National Digital Competence Assessment and Upskilling Platform · 88

Gebietsbetreuung Stadterneuerung — Vienna's Soft Urban Renewal Offices · 86

Austria's Constitutional Gender Budgeting Mandate (Article 13(3) B-VG) · 85

Vienna's Dual Social Housing Model — Municipal Gemeindebau plus Limited-Profit Housing at City Scale · 81

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Austria concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more