evidoria

What works in Windhoek

All catalogues · Namibia profile

17
evaluated practices
52/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 14 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Windhoek

SchoolNet Namibia connected up to roughly 500 of Namibia's 1,500–1,600 schools to the internet by 2006 through open-source computer labs and trained youth technicians, though the organisation dissolved in 2009 after losing government support and facing sustainability challenges. NUST's Indigenous Knowledge in Digital World Cluster culminated in a July 2025 international indigenous-knowledge gathering in Windhoek that established a UNESCO Chair in Digital Technology Design with Indigenous People. The evidence documents digital technology initiatives in the capital but does not quantify broader economic, social or governance outcomes specific to Windhoek itself.

Drawn from: Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia — Community-Led Savings and In-Situ Upgrading · SWAPO 50/50 Electoral Quota — Namibia's Path to Gender Parity in Parliament · NUST's Indigenous Knowledge in Digital World Cluster — Co-Designing Digital Tools with Namibia's San and OvaHimba Communities · SchoolNet Namibia · ConsumerConnect — Namibia's Multi-Regulator AI Platform for Financial and Telecom Complaints · Women and Child Protection Units — Namibia's Police-Based Response to Gender-Based Violence, and Its Capacity Strain · Namibia National De-bushing Programme — Bush Encroachment Control for Water & Rangeland Restoration · Africa-Asia Youth Coding Initiative Phase II — UNESCO-CODEMAO AI Curriculum Integration in Namibia

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +18 pts 67 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +18 pts 67 here · 49 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +9 pts 83 here · 74 average

Innovation level +9 pts 71 here · 62 average

Weaknesses

Equity & inclusion -8 pts 42 here · 50 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Scalability & sustainability -12 pts 50 here · 62 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -19 pts 8 here · 28 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Impact on gender equality -21 pts 50 here · 71 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Demonstrated reach -42 pts 33 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 48
Evaluation evidence
67 · 49
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 48
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 74
Innovation level
71 · 62
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 43
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
8 · 6
Sustainability
76 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Transferability / replicability
56 · 60
Transparency, ethics & data protection
42 · 47
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 57
Equity & inclusion
42 · 50
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Scalability & sustainability
50 · 62
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
8 · 28
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Impact on gender equality
50 · 71
Efficiency
0 · 33
Demonstrated reach
33 · 76

Coloured bar: Windhoek. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia — Community-Led Savings and In-Situ Upgrading · 86

SWAPO 50/50 Electoral Quota — Namibia's Path to Gender Parity in Parliament · 85

NUST's Indigenous Knowledge in Digital World Cluster — Co-Designing Digital Tools with Namibia's San and OvaHimba Communities · 80

SchoolNet Namibia · 76

ConsumerConnect — Namibia's Multi-Regulator AI Platform for Financial and Telecom Complaints · 60

Women and Child Protection Units — Namibia's Police-Based Response to Gender-Based Violence, and Its Capacity Strain · 59

Namibia National De-bushing Programme — Bush Encroachment Control for Water & Rangeland Restoration · 53

Africa-Asia Youth Coding Initiative Phase II — UNESCO-CODEMAO AI Curriculum Integration in Namibia · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more