evidoria

What works in Namibia

All catalogues

15
evaluated practices
45/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 12 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Namibia

Namibia has pursued community-led housing solutions and gender parity through distinct policy approaches. The Shack Dwellers Federation has secured land tenure for 3,200 households and built 1,350 homes at roughly a third of contractor costs since the early 1990s, though this addresses only a fraction of the country's ~217,000 households in informal settlements and ~300,000-unit housing backlog. SWAPO's 50/50 electoral quota raised women's representation in the National Assembly from 21% in 2010 to 49% by 2024, positioning Namibia sixth globally and first on the African continent after Rwanda. More recently, the country launched ConsumerConnect, a multi-regulator AI platform for financial and telecom complaints funded by the Gates Foundation, in response to bank fraud losses exceeding N$65 million in the first ten months of 2025.

Drawn from: Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia — Community-Led Savings and In-Situ Upgrading · SWAPO 50/50 Electoral Quota — Namibia's Path to Gender Parity in Parliament · SchoolNet Namibia · ConsumerConnect — Namibia's Multi-Regulator AI Platform for Financial and Telecom Complaints · Namibia National De-bushing Programme — Bush Encroachment Control for Water & Rangeland Restoration · Africa-Asia Youth Coding Initiative Phase II — UNESCO-CODEMAO AI Curriculum Integration in Namibia · Connected African Girls Coding Camp — AI, Robotics & IoT Skills for Young Women in Windhoek, Namibia · Namibia Community-Based Natural Resource Management - Communal Conservancies

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +8 pts 58 here · 50 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of impact / measured public value -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Equity & inclusion -11 pts 42 here · 52 average

Evidence of learning impact -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -12 pts 25 here · 37 average

Scalability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -22 pts 8 here · 31 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -31 pts 17 here · 48 average

Sustainability -32 pts 47 here · 78 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Curator validation
100 · 74
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 51
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 50
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 76
Evaluation evidence
50 · 45
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
8 · 7
Transferability / replicability
60 · 60
Innovation level
63 · 63
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 59
Equity & inclusion
42 · 52
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 28
Teacher capability & pedagogy
25 · 37
Scalability & sustainability
50 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
8 · 31
Documented learning
50 · 74
Demonstrated reach
50 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
17 · 48
Sustainability
47 · 78
Efficiency
0 · 44

Coloured bar: Namibia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia — Community-Led Savings and In-Situ Upgrading · 86

SWAPO 50/50 Electoral Quota — Namibia's Path to Gender Parity in Parliament · 85

SchoolNet Namibia · 76

ConsumerConnect — Namibia's Multi-Regulator AI Platform for Financial and Telecom Complaints · 60

Namibia National De-bushing Programme — Bush Encroachment Control for Water & Rangeland Restoration · 53

Africa-Asia Youth Coding Initiative Phase II — UNESCO-CODEMAO AI Curriculum Integration in Namibia · 53

Connected African Girls Coding Camp — AI, Robotics & IoT Skills for Young Women in Windhoek, Namibia · 47

Namibia Community-Based Natural Resource Management - Communal Conservancies · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Namibia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more