evidoria

What works in Bermuda

All catalogues

3
evaluated practices
48/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Bermuda

Drawn from: Insurance Regulatory Sandbox & Innovation Hub — Bermuda's Six-Year InsurTech Testing Ground · Work From Bermuda One-Year Residency Certificate · Bermuda Cahow Recovery Programme — Nonsuch Island Rat Biosecurity

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Sustainability / continuity -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Scalability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Score profile vs peers

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 59
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 60
Innovation
67 · 63
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Sustainability / continuity
50 · 78
Scalability
33 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 50

Coloured bar: Bermuda. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Insurance Regulatory Sandbox & Innovation Hub — Bermuda's Six-Year InsurTech Testing Ground · 57

Work From Bermuda One-Year Residency Certificate · 52

Bermuda Cahow Recovery Programme — Nonsuch Island Rat Biosecurity · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Bermuda concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more